ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023
Deep Ensembles Are Robust to Occasional Catastrophic Failures of Individual DNNs for Organs Segmentations in CT Images.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of intestinal tumor segmentation in PET CT scans using organ based and whole body deep learning.BMC medical imaging · 2025Trial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have recently showed remarkable performance in various computer vision tasks, including classification and segmentation of medical images. Deep ensembles (an aggregated prediction of multiple DNNs) were shown to improve a DNN's performance in various classification tasks. Here we explore how deep ensembles perform in the image segmentation task, in particular, organ segmentations in CT (Computed Tomography) images. Ensembles of V-Nets were trained to segment multiple organs using several in-house and publicly available clinical studies. The ensembles segmentations were tested on images from a different set of studies, and the effects of ensemble size as well as other ensemble parameters were explored for various organs. Compared to single models, Deep Ensembles significantly improved the average segmentation accuracy, especially for those organs where the accuracy was lower. More importantly, Deep Ensembles strongly reduced occasional "catastrophic" segmentation failures characteristic of single models and variability of the segmentation accuracy from image to image. To quantify this we defined the "high risk images": images for which at least one model produced an outlier metric (performed in the lower 5% percentile). These images comprised about 12% of the test images across all organs. Ensembles performed without outliers for 68%-100% of the "high risk images" depending on the performance metric used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.