ArticleAMB Express2023
Yeast diversity in pit mud and related volatile compounds in fermented grains of chinese strong-flavour liquor.
Article in AMB Express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimized method for analyzing volatile compounds in edible yeast using headspace SPME-GC-MS.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Longitudinal alterations of gut mycobiota during 2 years after COVID-19 and its correlation with pulmonary sequela.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Bioturbation analysis of microbial community and organic acid metabolism in the enriched liquid of pit mud by Daqu, HuangShui, and ZaoPei.Food science and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Exploring Community Succession, Assembly Patterns, and Metabolic Functions of Ester-Producing-Related Microbiota during the Production ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Chinese strong-flavour liquor is produced via a traditional solid-state fermentation strategy facilitated by live microorganisms in pit mud-based cellars. For the present analysis, pit mud samples from different spatial locations within fermentation cellars were collected, and the yeast communities therein were assessed via culture-based and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) approaches. These analyses revealed significant differences in the composition of yeast communities present in different layers of pit mud. In total, 29 different yeast species were detected, and principal component analyses revealed clear differences in microbial diversity in pit mud samples taken from different cellar locations. Culture-dependent strategies similarly detected 20 different yeast species in these samples. However, while Geotrichum silvicola, Torulaspora delbrueckii, Hanseniaspora uvarum, Saturnispora silvae, Issatchenkia orientalis, Candida mucifera, Kazachstania barnettii, Cyberlindnera jadinii, Hanseniaspora spp., Alternaria tenuissima, Cryptococcus laurentii, Metschnikowia spp., and Rhodotorula dairenensis were detected via a PCR-DGGE approach, they were not detectable in culture-dependent analyses. In contrast, culture-based approaches led to the identification of Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Debaryomyces hansenii in these pit mud samples, whereas they were not detected using DGGE fingerprints profiles. An additional HS-SPME-GC-MS-based analysis of the volatile compounds present in fermented grains samples led to the identification of 66 such compounds, with the highest levels of volatile acids, esters, and alcohols being detected in fermented grains from lower layer samples. A canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) suggested they were significant correlations between pit mud yeast communities and associated volatile compounds in fermented grains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.