Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37291363›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2023

A Postcard Primer Prior to Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test Among Veterans: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Stefanie Deeds, Terrence Liu, Linnaea Schuttner, Chelle Wheat, Eric Gunnink, John Geyer, Lauren Beste, Anders Chen, Jason A Dominitz, Kari Nelson and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening via Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Testing in a Veterans Affairs Health System.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stefanie DeedsDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. Stefanie.Deeds@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-1398-1031
Terrence LiuDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Linnaea SchuttnerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Chelle WheatPuget Sound Health Care System, Veterans Health Administration Department of Veterans Affairs, Seattle, WA, USA.
Eric GunninkPuget Sound Health Care System, Veterans Health Administration Department of Veterans Affairs, Seattle, WA, USA.
John GeyerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lauren BesteDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Anders ChenDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jason A DominitzPuget Sound Health Care System, Veterans Health Administration Department of Veterans Affairs, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kari NelsonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ashok ReddyDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) programs are increasingly utilized for population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Advanced notifications (primers) are one behavioral designed feature of many mailed FIT programs, but few have tested this feature among Veterans.

objectiveTo determine if an advanced notification, a primer postcard, increases completion of FIT among Veterans.

designThis is a prospective, randomized quality improvement trial to evaluate a postcard primer prior to a mailed FIT versus mailed FIT alone.

participantsA total of 2404 Veterans enrolled for care at a large VA site that were due for average-risk CRC screening.

interventionA written postcard sent 2 weeks in advance of a mailed FIT kit that contained information on CRC screening and completing a FIT. MAIN MEASURES: Our primary outcome was FIT completion at 90 days, and our secondary outcome was FIT completion at 180 days. KEY

resultsOverall, unadjusted mailed FIT return rates were similar among control vs. primer arms at 90 days (27% vs. 29%, p = 0.11). Our adjusted analysis found a primer postcard did not increase FIT completion compared to mailed FIT alone (OR 1.14 (0.94, 1.37)).

conclusionsThough primers are often a standard part of mailed FIT programs, we did not find an increase in FIT completion with mailed postcard primers among Veterans. Given the overall low mailed FIT return rates, testing different ways to improve return rates is essential to improving CRC screening.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsVeteransEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningOccult BloodProspective Studiescancer screening.population healthpreventative health

Identifiers

PMID37291363
PMCPMC10249919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.