ArticleScientific reports2023
Assessing the impacts of dam/weir operation on streamflow predictions using LSTM across South Korea.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, weather data have been applied to one of deep learning techniques known as "long short-term memory (LSTM)" to predict streamflow in rainfall-runoff relationships. However, this approach may not be suitable for regions with artificial water management structures such as dams and weirs. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the prediction accuracy of LSTM for streamflow depending on the availability of dam/weir operational data across South Korea. Four scenarios were prepared for 25 streamflow stations. Scenarios #1 and #2 used weather data and weather and dam/weir operational data, respectively, with the same LSTM model conditions for all stations. Scenarios #3 and #4 used weather data and weather and dam/weir operational data, respectively, with the different LSTM models for individual stations. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and the root mean squared error (RMSE) were adopted to assess the LSTM's performance. The results indicated that the mean values of NSE and RMSE were 0.277 and 292.6 (Scenario #1), 0.482 and 214.3 (Scenario #2), 0.410 and 260.7 (Scenario #3), and 0.592 and 181.1 (Scenario #4), respectively. Overall, the model performance was improved by the addition of dam/weir operational data, with an increase in NSE values of 0.182-0.206 and a decrease in RMSE values of 78.2-79.6. Surprisingly, the degree of performance improvement varied according to the operational characteristics of the dam/weir, and the performance tended to increase when the dam/weir with high frequency and great amount of water discharge was included. Our findings showed that the overall LSTM prediction of streamflow was improved by the inclusion of dam/weir operational data. When using dam/weir operational data to predict streamflow using LSTM, understanding of their operational characteristics is important to obtain reliable streamflow predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.