Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37291086›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Patterns in soil microbial diversity across Europe.

Maëva Labouyrie, Cristiano Ballabio, Ferran Romero, Panos Panagos, Arwyn Jones, Marc W Schmid, Vladimir Mikryukov, Olesya Dulya, Leho Tedersoo, Mohammad Bahram and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 95 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Global climate gradients structure soilbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maëva LabouyrieDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0313-0404
Cristiano BallabioEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, VA, Italy.
Ferran RomeroPlant-Soil-Interactions, Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2986-4166
Panos PanagosEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, VA, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1484-2738
Arwyn JonesEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, VA, Italy.
Marc W SchmidMWSchmid GmbH, Glarus, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9554-5318
Vladimir MikryukovMycology and Microbiology Center, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Olesya DulyaMycology and Microbiology Center, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Leho TedersooMycology and Microbiology Center, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-1635-1249
Mohammad BahramDepartment of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-9539-3307
Emanuele LugatoEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, VA, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8947-352X
Marcel G A van der HeijdenDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland. marcel.vanderheijden@agroscope.admin.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-7040-1924
Alberto OrgiazziEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, VA, Italy. alberto.orgiazzi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8390-6654

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Factors driving microbial community composition and diversity are well established but the relationship with microbial functioning is poorly understood, especially at large scales. We analysed microbial biodiversity metrics and distribution of potential functional groups along a gradient of increasing land-use perturbation, detecting over 79,000 bacterial and 25,000 fungal OTUs in 715 sites across 24 European countries. We found the lowest bacterial and fungal diversity in less-disturbed environments (woodlands) compared to grasslands and highly-disturbed environments (croplands). Highly-disturbed environments contain significantly more bacterial chemoheterotrophs, harbour a higher proportion of fungal plant pathogens and saprotrophs, and have less beneficial fungal plant symbionts compared to woodlands and extensively-managed grasslands. Spatial patterns of microbial communities and predicted functions are best explained when interactions among the major determinants (vegetation cover, climate, soil properties) are considered. We propose guidelines for environmental policy actions and argue that taxonomical and functional diversity should be considered simultaneously for monitoring purposes.

Indexed as

SoilSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaBiodiversityEuropeFungiSoil

Identifiers

PMID37291086
PMCPMC10250377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.