Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37290925›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2023

Developing a definition of immune exclusion in cancer: results of a modified Delphi workshop.

Guy Travis Clifton, Mace Rothenberg, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Glenn Begley, Michael Cecchini, Joseph Paul Eder, Francois Ghiringhelli, Antoine Italiano, Marina Kochetkova, Rong Li and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Macrophage Plasticity in Cancer Therapy: Function, Timing, and Tradeoffs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Guy Travis CliftonParthenon Therapeutics, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Travis@parthenontx.com.
Mace RothenbergConsultant, Parthenon Therapeutics, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Paolo Antonio AsciertoMelanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy.
Glenn BegleyParthenon Therapeutics, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael CecchiniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Joseph Paul EderParthenon Therapeutics, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Francois GhiringhelliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center-UNICANCER, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5465-8305
Antoine ItalianoEarly Phase Trial Unit, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux 33000, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8540-5351
Marina KochetkovaCentre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Rong LiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Fatima Mechta-GrigoriouStress and Cancer Laboratory, Institut Curie, INSERM, Paris, France.
Sara I PaiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6341-9971
Paolo ProvenzanoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Ellen PuréDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Antoni RibasDivision of Hematology and Oncology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3669-8458
Kurt A SchalperDepartment of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5692-4833
Wolf Herve FridmanDepartment of Immunology, Inflammation and Cancer, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1332-0973

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Boosting Antitumor Immunity by Blocking Both Tumor and Adipose DDR1R01CA246707 · NCI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LI, RONG · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
Immunomodulatory Effects of Targeting DNA Repair with Novel Temozolomide Combinations in Colorectal CancerK08CA255465 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CECCHINI, MICHAEL · 2021 to 2025
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS K08 CA255465NCI NIH HHS R01 CA246707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Checkpoint inhibitors represent an effective treatment approach for a variety of cancers through their inhibition of immune regulatory pathways within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Unfortunately only a minority of patients with cancer achieve clinical benefit from immunotherapy, with the TME emerging as an important predictor of outcomes and sensitivity to therapy. The extent and pattern of T-cell infiltration can vary prominently within/across tumors and represents a biological continuum. Three immune profiles have been identified along this continuum: 'immune-desert' or 'T-cell cold' phenotype, 'immune-active', 'inflamed', or 'T-cell hot' phenotype, and 'immune excluded' phenotype. Of the three profiles, immune excluded remains the most ill-defined with no clear, universally accepted definition even though it is commonly associated with lack of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors and poor clinical outcomes. To address this, 16 multidisciplinary cancer experts from around the world were invited to participate in a symposium using a three-round modified Delphi approach. The first round was an open-ended questionnaire distributed via email and the second was an in-person discussion of the first round results that allowed for statements to be revised as necessary to achieve a maximum consensus (75% agreement) among the rating committee (RC). The final round questionnaire was distributed to the RC via email and had a 100% completion rate. The Delphi process resulted in moving us closer to a consensus definition for immune exclusion that is practical, clinically pertinent, and applicable across a wide range of cancer histologies. A general consensus of the role of immune exclusion in resistance to checkpoint therapy and five research priorities emerged from this process. Together, these tools could help efforts designed to address the underlying mechanisms of immune exclusion that span cancer types and, ultimately, aid in the development of treatments to target these mechanisms to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapySurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeTumor Microenvironmenttumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID37290925
PMCPMC10254706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.