ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2023
Reliable Identification and Interpretation of Single-Cell Molecular Heterogeneity and Transcriptional Regulation using Dynamic Ensemble Pruning.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Synthesis of Multi-Modal Representations for CITE-seq Data Integration and Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- DeepNanoHi-C: deep learning enables accurate single-cell nanopore long-read data analysis and 3D genome interpretation.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- PredGCN: a Pruning-enabled Gene-Cell Net for automatic cell annotation of single cell transcriptome data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Reliable Identification and Interpretation of Single-Cell Molecular Heterogeneity and Transcriptional Regulation using Dynamic Ensemble Pruning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unsupervised clustering is an essential step in identifying cell types from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. However, a common issue with unsupervised clustering models is that the optimization direction of the objective function and the final generated clustering labels in the absence of supervised information may be inconsistent or even arbitrary. To address this challenge, a dynamic ensemble pruning framework (DEPF) is proposed to identify and interpret single-cell molecular heterogeneity. In particular, a silhouette coefficient-based indicator is developed to determine the optimization direction of the bi-objective function. In addition, a hierarchical autoencoder is employed to project the high-dimensional data onto multiple low-dimensional latent space sets, and then a clustering ensemble is produced in the latent space by the basic clustering algorithm. Following that, a bi-objective fruit fly optimization algorithm is designed to prune dynamically the low-quality basic clustering in the ensemble. Multiple experiments are conducted on 28 real scRNA-seq datasets and one large real scRNA-seq dataset from diverse platforms and species to validate the effectiveness of the DEPF. In addition, biological interpretability and transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulatory are conducted to explore biological patterns from the cell types identified, which could provide novel insights into characterizing the mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.