Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37289803›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Intra- and inter-rater reliability, agreement, and minimal detectable change of the handheld dynamometer in individuals with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis.

Gilvan Ferreira Vaz, Felipe Florêncio Freire, Henrique Mansur Gonçalves, Marcus Alexandre Brito de Aviz, Wagner Rodrigues Martins, João Luiz Quagliotti Durigan

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gilvan Ferreira VazFaculty of Ceilândia, Rehabilitation Sciences Program, University of Brasilia, Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3239-4668
Felipe Florêncio FreireMedicine Division, Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital das Forças Armadas (HFA), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Henrique Mansur GonçalvesOrthopedic Department of the Santa Helena Hospital, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Marcus Alexandre Brito de AvizAnesthesiology Department of the Institute Hospital de Base, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Wagner Rodrigues MartinsFaculty of Ceilândia, Rehabilitation Sciences Program, University of Brasilia, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
João Luiz Quagliotti DuriganFaculty of Ceilândia, Rehabilitation Sciences Program, University of Brasilia, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Universidade de Brasília · BRHospital de Base · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe handheld dynamometer has been validated to measure muscle strength in different muscle groups. However, to date, it has not been tested in individuals who experience pain induced by hip osteoarthritis. The current study aimed to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability, agreement, and minimal detectable change of the Lafayette handheld dynamometer, model 1165, to assess the peak force (Pk) and average peak force (Af) of hip muscles in individuals with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis.

methodsTwenty participants with hip osteoarthritis (mean ± SD age: 58.7±15.3 years; body mass index: 28.8±4.2 kg/m2) and pain intensity on the Visual Analogue Scale ≥ 4 (8.05±1.2) were recruited to participate in this study. Pk and Af of hip flexors (seated position), abductors and adductors (supine position), and extensors (prone position) were collected in a single day by two independent raters, each one obtaining test and retest in randomly ordered separate sessions.

resultsThe intra-rater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was classified as good (>0.75) or excellent (≥0.90) for all muscle groups and all inter-rater ICCs were classified as excellent. Rater A had a lower standard error of measurement compared to rater B, ranging from 0.15 to 0.58 kilogram-force (Kgf) compared with 0.34 to 1.25 kg, respectively. However, the inter-rater comparison showed a minimal detectable change (MDC) of < 10% for all Pk and Af measures for hip adductors and extensors. Finally, the inter-rater Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement for abductors, adductors, and extensors.

conclusionDespite pain and dysfunction related to hip osteoarthritis, the mean of two measures using a handheld dynamometer was shown to be a reliable tool to assess hip muscle strength, with good to excellent intra- and inter-rater ICCs, satisfactory agreement, and small values for MDC.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, HipAdultAgedHumansMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthMuscle Strength DynamometerReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID37289803
PMCPMC10249871
OpenAlexW4379929813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.