ArticlePloS one2023
CoAt-Mixer: Self-attention deep learning framework for left ventricular hypertrophy using electrocardiography.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Deep learning and electrocardiography: systematic review of current techniques in cardiovascular disease diagnosis and management.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Pooled it
- Automated estimation of computed tomography-derived left ventricular mass using sex-specific 12-lead ECG-based temporal convolutional network.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Screening for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Based on 12 Leads of the Electrocardiogram-Applicable in Clinical Practice?-Critical Literature Review with Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left ventricular hypertrophy is a significant independent risk factor for all-cause mortality and morbidity, and an accurate diagnosis at an early stage of heart change is clinically significant. Electrocardiography is the most convenient, economical, and non-invasive method for screening in primary care. However, the coincidence rate of the actual left ventricular hypertrophy and diagnostic findings was low, consequently increasing the interest in algorithms using big data and deep learning. We attempted to diagnose left ventricular hypertrophy using big data and deep learning algorithms, and aimed to confirm its diagnostic power according to the differences between males and females. This retrospective study used electrocardiographs obtained at Yonsei University Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju, Korea, from October 2010 to February 2020. Binary classification was performed for primary screening for left ventricular hypertrophy. Three datasets were used for the experiment: the male, female, and entire dataset. A cutoff for binary classification was defined as the meaningful as a screening test (<132 g/m2 vs. ≥132 g/m2, <109 g/m2 vs. ≥109 g/m2). Six types of input were used for the classification tasks. We attempted to determine whether electrocardiography had predictive power for left ventricular hypertrophy diagnosis. For the entire dataset, the model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.836 (95% CI, 0.833-838) with a sensitivity of 78.37% (95% CI, 76.79-79.95). For the male dataset, the AUROC was 0.826 (95% CI, 0.822-830) with a sensitivity of 76.73% (95% CI, 75.14-78.33). For the female dataset, the AUROC was 0.772 (95% CI, 0.769-775) with a sensitivity of 72.90% (95% CI, 70.33-75.46). Our model confirmed that left ventricular hypertrophy can be classified to some extent using electrocardiography, demographics, and electrocardiography features. In particular, a learning environment that considered gender differences was constructed. Consequently, the difference in diagnostic power between men and women was confirmed. Our model will help patients with suspected left ventricular hypertrophy to undergo screening tests at a low cost. In addition, our research and attempts will show the expected effect that gender-consideration approaches can help with various currently proposed diagnostic methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.