ArticlePloS one2023
Waist-What? Can a single sensor positioned at the waist detect parameters of gait at a speed and distance reflective of older adults' activity?
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Gait Event Detection and Gait Parameter Estimation from a Single Waist-Worn IMU Sensor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Motor and Nonmotor Measures and Declining Daily Physical Activity in Older Adults.JAMA network open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the problems facing an ageing population is functional decline associated with reduced levels of physical activity (PA). Traditionally researcher or clinician input is necessary to capture parameters of gait or PA. Enabling older adults to monitor their activity independently could raise their awareness of their activitiy levels, promote self-care and potentially mitigate the risks associated with ageing. The ankle is accepted as the optimum position for sensor placement to capture parameters of gait however, the waist is proposed as a more accessible body-location for older adults. This study aimed to compare step-count measurements obtained from a single inertial sensor positioned at the ankle and at the waist to that of a criterion measure of step-count, and to compare gait parameters obtained from the sensors positioned at the two different body-locations. Step-count from the waist-mounted inertial sensor was compared with that from the ankle-mounted sensor, and with a criterion measure of direct observation in healthy young and healthy older adults during a three-minute treadmill walk test. Parameters of gait obtained from the sensors at both body-locations were also compared. Results indicated there was a strong positive correlation between step-count measured by both the ankle and waist sensors and the criterion measure, and between ankle and waist sensor step-count, mean step time and mean stride time (r = .802-1.0). There was a moderate correlation between the step time variability measures at the waist and ankle (r = .405). This study demonstrates that a single sensor positioned at the waist is an appropriate method for the capture of important measures of gait and physical activity among older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.