Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37289410›Full record

ReviewAdvances in therapy2023

Natamycin Ocular Delivery: Challenges and Advancements in Ocular Therapeutics.

Mabel Mascarenhas, Pinal Chaudhari, Shaila A Lewis

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Sulfur Vacancy-Rich MoSAdvanced healthcare materials · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Chelidonic acid amelioratesFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Smart contact lenses: recent advances and future challenges in eye disease diagnosis and treatment.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mabel MascarenhasDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhavnagar, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Pinal ChaudhariDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhavnagar, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.
Shaila A LewisDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Madhavnagar, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India. s.lewis@manipal.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2884-0015
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal keratitis, an ocular fungal infection, is one of the leading causes of monocular blindness. Natamycin has long been considered the mainstay drug used for treating fungal keratitis and is the only US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA)-approved drug, commercially available as a topical 5% w/v suspension. Furthermore, ocular fungal infection treatment takes a few weeks to months to recover, and the available marketed antifungal suspensions are associated with poor residence time, limited bioavailability (< 5%) and high dosing frequency as well as minor irritation and discomfort. Despite these challenges, natamycin is still the preferred drug choice for treating fungal keratitis, as it has fewer side effects and less ocular toxicity and is more effective against Fusarium species than other antifungal agents. Several novel therapeutic approaches for the topical delivery of natamycin have been reported to overcome the challenges posed by the conventional dosage forms and to improve ocular bioavailability for the efficient management of fungal keratitis. Current progress in the delivery systems uses approaches aimed at improving the corneal residence time, bioavailability and antifungal potency, thereby reducing the dose and dosing frequency of natamycin. In this review, we discuss the various strategies explored to overcome the challenges present in ocular drug delivery of natamycin and improve its bioavailability for ocular therapeutics.

Indexed as

Eye Infections, FungalKeratitisAntifungal AgentsCorneaHumansNatamycinAntifungal AgentsNatamycinFungal keratitisMarketed formulationsNatamycinNovel formulationsOcular deliveryPatents

Identifiers

PMID37289410
PMCPMC10329963
OpenAlexW4379769603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.