ReviewMagma (New York, N.Y.)2023
An evolution of low-field strength MRI.
Review in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRpro: Open Framework for Model-Based, Learned, and Quantitative MR Imaging-Application to Low-Field MRI.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- A scoping review of portable ultra-low-field MRI studies in patients with acquired brain injury: Past, present, and future.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Review
- Subject grounding to reduce electromagnetic interference for MRI scanners operating in unshielded environments.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Determinants of image quality in respiratory triggered free breathing lung MRI at 0.55 T in adults.Radiology advances · 2026Article
- Low-field and portable MRI technology: advancements and innovations.European radiology experimental · 2025Review
- Review
- Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Full-Wave Simulation of Radiofrequency Birdcage Coils for Musculoskeletal Limb Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quo Vadis MRI?Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2025Article
- Review
- CT and MR Imaging in Colorectal Carcinoma: A Tool for Diagnosis, Staging, Response Evaluation, and Follow-Up.South Asian journal of cancer · 2024Review
- Preliminary Experience with Three Alternative Motion Sensors for 0.55 Tesla MR Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- New clinical opportunities of low-field MRI: heart, lung, body, and musculoskeletal.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Deep learning enabled fast 3D brain MRI at 0.055 tesla.Science advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paper describes the evolution of low-field MRI from the very early pioneering days in the late 70 s until today. It is not meant to give a comprehensive historical account of the development of MRI, but rather to highlight the different research environments then and now. In the early 90 s, when low-field systems below 1.5 T essentially vanished, there were just no reasonable means available to make up for the factor of roughly three in signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) between 0.5 and 1.5 T. This has drastically changed. Improvements in hardware-closed Helium-free magnets, RF receiver systems and especially much faster gradients, much more flexible sampling schemes including parallel imaging and compressed sensing and especially the use of AI at all stages of the imaging process have made low-field MRI a clinically viable supplement to conventional MRI. Ultralow-field MRI with magnets around 0.05 T are also back and constitute a bold and courageous endeavor to bring MRI to communities, which have neither the means nor the infrastructure to sustain a current standard of care MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.