ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[CT technology: photon-counting detector computed tomography].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photon-counting CT in head and neck radiology: bridging detector physics and clinical applications.European radiology · 2026Review
- Application and Development of Spectral CT in Target Delineation for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Lesion conspicuity assessment of prone 40-keV virtual monoenergetic imaging in arterial-phase photon-counting CT for breast cancer: a retrospective comparison with DCE-MRI.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Integration of Photon-Counting CT into the Surgical Workflow of Complex Maxillofacial Reconstruction: A Pilot Feasibility Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reduction of Metal Artefacts in Pediatric Imaging - New Possibilities Through Photon Counting Computed Tomography.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhoton-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) is a CT technology that overcomes many limitations of conventional detectors. Direct conversion of photons hitting the detector into electrical signals combined with more sensitive and accurate photon detection simultaneously allows spectral evaluation and also potential reduction in radiation exposure to the patient. The combination of energy thresholds and elimination of detector septa allows for a reduction of electronic noise, an increase of spatial resolution, and an improvement of dose efficiency. ACHIEVEMENTS: Recent research has confirmed significantly reduced image noise, reduced radiation dose, increased spatial resolution, improved iodine signal, and a reduction in artifacts. Spectral imaging potentiates these effects and also allows retrospective calculation of virtual monoenergetic images, virtual noncontrast images or iodine maps. Thus, the photon-counting technique offers the possibility of using various contrast agents, with the prospect of single-scan multiphase imaging or visualization of specific metabolic processes. Therefore, further research and complementary approval processes are necessary for clinical application. Likewise, further research is needed to develop and validate optimal settings and reconstructions for a wide variety of situations, as well as to test new application possibilities.
conclusionsThe only photon-counting detector CT device available on the market to date received clinical approval in 2021. It remains to be seen which other applications will become possible through improvements in hardware and software. This technology has already demonstrated an impressive superiority compared with the current standard of CT imaging, especially regarding high-resolution imaging of detailed structures and examinations with high radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.