Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37289245›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

An automated surgical decision-making framework for partial or radical nephrectomy based on 3D-CT multi-level anatomical features in renal cell carcinoma.

Huancheng Yang, Kai Wu, Hanlin Liu, Peng Wu, Yangguang Yuan, Lei Wang, Yaru Liu, Haoyang Zeng, Junkai Li, Weihao Liu and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Huancheng YangTeaching Center of Shenzhen Luohu Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515000, China.
Kai WuDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Hanlin LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Peng WuDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Yangguang YuanDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Yaru LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Haoyang ZengTeaching Center of Shenzhen Luohu Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515000, China.
Junkai LiTeaching Center of Shenzhen Luohu Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515000, China.
Weihao LiuTeaching Center of Shenzhen Luohu Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515000, China.
Song WuTeaching Center of Shenzhen Luohu Hospital, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515000, China. wusong@szu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3504-1630

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2019A1515110038Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61931024Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program 202208183000146Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Program RCJC20200714114557005Special Funds for the Basic Research and Development Program in the Central Non-profit Research Institutesof China 20180309163446298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether 3D-CT multi-level anatomical features can provide a more accurate prediction of surgical decision-making for partial or radical nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma.

methodsThis is a retrospective study based on multi-center cohorts. A total of 473 participants with pathologically proved renal cell carcinoma were split into the internal training and the external testing set. The training set contains 412 cases from five open-source cohorts and two local hospitals. The external testing set includes 61 participants from another local hospital. The proposed automatic analytic framework contains the following modules: a 3D kidney and tumor segmentation model constructed by 3D-UNet, a multi-level feature extractor based on the region of interest, and a partial or radical nephrectomy prediction classifier by XGBoost. The fivefold cross-validation strategy was used to get a robust model. A quantitative model interpretation method called the Shapley Additive Explanations was conducted to explore the contribution of each feature.

resultsIn the prediction of partial versus radical nephrectomy, the combination of multi-level features achieved better performance than any single-level feature. For the internal validation, the AUROC was 0.93 ± 0.1, 0.94 ± 0.1, 0.93 ± 0.1, 0.93 ± 0.1, and 0.93 ± 0.1, respectively, as determined by the fivefold cross-validation. The AUROC from the optimal model was 0.82 ± 0.1 in the external testing set. The tumor shape Maximum 3D Diameter plays the most vital role in the model decision.

conclusionsThe automated surgical decision framework for partial or radical nephrectomy based on 3D-CT multi-level anatomical features exhibits robust performance in renal cell carcinoma. The framework points the way towards guiding surgery through medical images and machine learning. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: We proposed an automated analytic framework that can assist surgeons in partial or radical nephrectomy decision-making. The framework points the way towards guiding surgery through medical images and machine learning. KEY POINTS: • The 3D-CT multi-level anatomical features provide a more accurate prediction of surgical decision-making for partial or radical nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma. • The data from multicenter study and a strict fivefold cross-validation strategy, both internal validation set and external testing set, can be easily transferred to different tasks of new datasets. • The quantitative decomposition of the prediction model was conducted to explore the contribution of each extracted feature.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsHumansNephrectomyRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCarcinoma, renal cellDecision-makingDeep learningMachine learningNephrectomy

Identifiers

PMID37289245
PMCPMC10598088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.