Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37289194›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

Clinical and Genomic Characteristics of Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Following Progression on Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 and 6 Inhibitors.

Xi Rao, Yongmei Chen, Julie Beyrer, Emily Nash Smyth, Claudia Morato Guimaraes, Lacey M Litchfield, Lee Bowman, Garreth W Lawrence, Amit Aggarwal, Fabrice Andre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. ESR1 Y537S and D538G Mutations Drive Resistance to CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xi RaoEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0002-8194-9052
Yongmei ChenEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0003-2246-0916
Julie BeyrerEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0002-7331-2625
Emily Nash SmythEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0003-0583-0882
Claudia Morato GuimaraesEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0002-9344-2320
Lacey M LitchfieldEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0009-0004-5232-9585
Lee BowmanEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0009-0001-3527-7224
Garreth W LawrenceEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0002-0919-787X
Amit AggarwalEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0003-4800-4046
Fabrice AndreUniversité Paris Sud, Orsay, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5795-8357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe explored the clinical and genomic characteristics of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after progression on cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4 and 6i) ± endocrine therapy (ET) to understand potential resistance mechanisms that may aid in identifying treatment options. EXPERIMENTAL

designPatients in the United States with HR+, HER2- MBC had tumor biopsies collected from a metastatic site during routine care following progression on a CDK4 and 6i ± ET (CohortPost) or prior to initiating CDK4 and 6i treatment (CohortPre) and analyzed using a targeted mutation panel and RNA-sequencing. Clinical and genomic characteristics were described.

resultsThe mean age at MBC diagnosis was 59 years in CohortPre (n = 133) and 56 years in CohortPost (n = 223); 14% and 45% of patients had prior chemotherapy/ET, and 35% and 26% had de novo stage IV MBC, respectively. The most common biopsy site was liver (CohortPre, 23%; CohortPost, 56%). CohortPost had significantly higher tumor mutational burden (TMB; median 3.16 vs. 1.67 Mut/Mb, P < 0.0001), ESR1 alteration frequency (mutations: 37% vs. 10%, FDR < 0.0001; fusions: 9% vs. 2%, P = 0.0176), and higher copy-number amplification of genes on chr12q15, including MDM2, FRS2, and YEATS4 versus patients in the CohortPre group. In addition, CDK4 copy-number gain on chr12q13 was significantly higher in CohortPost versus CohortPre (27% vs. 11%, P = 0.0005).

conclusionsDistinct mechanisms potentially associated with resistance to CDK4 and 6i ± ET, including alterations in ESR1 and amplification of chr12q15 and CDK4 copy-number gain, were identified.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGenes, cdcGenomicsHumansCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4ERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID37289194
PMCPMC10472108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.