ArticleMedical physics2023
Deep-learning based fast and accurate 3D CT deformable image registration in lung cancer.
Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noisy probing dose facilitated dose prediction for pencil beam scanning proton therapy: Physics enhances generalizability.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Impact of CT Intensity and Contrast Variability on Deep-Learning-Based Lung-Nodule Detection: A Systematic Review of Preprocessing and Harmonization Strategies (2020-2025).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based head and neck deformable image registration using spatio-temporal analysis and self attention.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Tumor-conditioned inter-patient registration using planning computed tomography for voxel-based analysis to predict radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Dual-metric Bayesian optimization of B-spline mesh size for 4DCT lung registration.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Article
- Critical review of patient outcome study in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.Meta-radiology · 2025Article
- Diffusion Transformer-based Universal Dose Denoising for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Evaluating the robustness of deep learning models trained to diagnose idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using a retrospective study.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Article
- Automated classification and explainable AI analysis of lung cancer stages using EfficientNet and gradient-weighted class activation mapping.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Accurate patient alignment without unnecessary imaging using patient-specific 3D CT images synthesized from 2D kV images.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Development of a Subtraction Processing Technology for Assistance in the Comparative Interpretation of Mammograms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Artificial general intelligence for radiation oncology.Meta-radiology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeformable Image Registration (DIR) is an essential technique required in many applications of radiation oncology. However, conventional DIR approaches typically take several minutes to register one pair of 3D CT images and the resulting deformable vector fields (DVFs) are only specific to the pair of images used, making it less appealing for clinical application. PURPOSE: A deep-learning-based DIR method using CT images is proposed for lung cancer patients to address the common drawbacks of the conventional DIR approaches and in turn can accelerate the speed of related applications, such as contour propagation, dose deformation, adaptive radiotherapy (ART), etc.
methodsA deep neural network based on VoxelMorph was developed to generate DVFs using CT images collected from 114 lung cancer patients. Two models were trained with the weighted mean absolute error (wMAE) loss and structural similarity index matrix (SSIM) loss (optional) (i.e., the MAE model and the M+S model). In total, 192 pairs of initial CT (iCT) and verification CT (vCT) were included as a training dataset and the other independent 10 pairs of CTs were included as a testing dataset. The vCTs usually were taken 2 weeks after the iCTs. The synthetic CTs (sCTs) were generated by warping the vCTs according to the DVFs generated by the pre-trained model. The image quality of the synthetic CTs was evaluated by measuring the similarity between the iCTs and the sCTs generated by the proposed methods and the conventional DIR approaches, respectively. Per-voxel absolute CT-number-difference volume histogram (CDVH) and MAE were used as the evaluation metrics. The time to generate the sCTs was also recorded and compared quantitatively. Contours were propagated using the derived DVFs and evaluated with SSIM. Forward dose calculations were done on the sCTs and the corresponding iCTs. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) were generated based on dose distributions on both iCTs and sCTs generated by two models, respectively. The clinically relevant DVH indices were derived for comparison. The resulted dose distributions were also compared using 3D Gamma analysis with thresholds of 3 mm/3%/10% and 2 mm/2%/10%, respectively.
resultsThe two models (wMAE and M+S) achieved a speed of 263.7±163 / 265.8±190 ms and a MAE of 13.15±3.8 / 17.52±5.8 HU for the testing dataset, respectively. The average SSIM scores of 0.987±0.006 and 0.988±0.004 were achieved by the two proposed models, respectively. For both models, CDVH of a typical patient showed that less than 5% of the voxels had a per-voxel absolute CT-number-difference larger than 55 HU. The dose distribution calculated based on a typical sCT showed differences of ≤2cGy[RBE] for clinical target volume (CTV) D
conclusionA deep neural network-based DIR approach was proposed and has been shown to be reasonably accurate and efficient to register the initial CTs and verification CTs in lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.