Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37289180›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2023

A crosswalk of commonly used frailty scales.

Stephanie Denise M Sison, Sandra M Shi, Kyung Moo Kim, Nessa Steinberg, Sohyun Jeong, Ellen P McCarthy, Dae Hyun Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Frailty Screening Using the Risk Analysis Index: A User Guide.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Frailty in Parkinson's disease: time to integrate it into treatment decision-making?Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluating Frailty Index Integrity: Insights from an International Network Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biomarkers and Clinical Evaluation in the Detection of Frailty.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frailty in Older Adults.The New England journal of medicine · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie Denise M SisonHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3894-7219
Sandra M ShiHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6801-5602
Kyung Moo KimJohn A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Nessa SteinbergHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sohyun JeongHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3805-4349
Ellen P McCarthyHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1705-6249
Dae Hyun KimHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7290-6838

Funding

Applications of Claims-Based Frailty Index to Advance Evidence for Frailty-Guided Decision-Making - Extension to ADRDR01AG071809 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI KIM, DAE HYUN · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
Greater Boston Medical Student Training in Aging ResearchT35AG038027 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI DRIVER, JANE A, MCLAUGHLIN-GAVIN, CARA · 2010 to 2024
$991k
Mid-Career Mentoring Award For Patient-Oriented Research in Frailty and Health OutcomesK24AG073527 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI Dae Hyun Kim · 2022 to 2026
$862k
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG073527NIA NIH HHS R01 AG071809NIA NIH HHS T35 AG038027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral validated scales have been developed to measure frailty, yet the direct relationship between these measures and their scores remains unknown. To bridge this gap, we created a crosswalk of the most commonly used frailty scales.

methodsWe used data from 7070 community-dwelling older adults who participated in National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) Round 5 to construct a crosswalk among frailty scales. We operationalized the Study of Osteoporotic Fracture Index (SOF), FRAIL Scale, Frailty Phenotype, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Vulnerable Elder Survey-13 (VES-13), Tilburg Frailty Indictor (TFI), Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS), and 40-item Frailty Index (FI). A crosswalk between FI and the frailty scales was created using the equipercentile linking method, a statistical procedure that produces equivalent scoring between scales according to percentile distributions. To demonstrate its validity, we determined the 4-year mortality risk across all scales for low-risk (equivalent to FI <0.20), moderate-risk (FI 0.20 to <0.40), and high-risk (FI ≥0.40) categories.

resultsUsing NHATS, the feasibility of calculating frailty scores was at least 90% for all nine scales, with the FI having the highest number of calculable scores. Participants considered frail on FI (cutpoint of 0.25) corresponded to the following scores on each frailty measure: SOF 1.3, FRAIL 1.7, Phenotype 1.7, CFS 5.3, VES-13 5.5, TFI 4.4, GFI 4.8, and EFS 5.8. Conversely, individuals considered frail according to the cutpoint of each frailty measure corresponded to the following FI scores: 0.37 for SOF, 0.40 for FRAIL, 0.42 for Phenotype, 0.21 for CFS, 0.16 for VES-13, 0.28 for TFI, 0.21 for GFI, and 0.37 for EFS. Across frailty scales, the 4-year mortality risks between the same categories were similar in magnitude.

conclusionOur results provide clinicians and researchers with a useful tool to directly compare and interpret frailty scores across scales.

Indexed as

FrailtyAgedFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHumansIndependent LivingRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnairesequipercentilefrailtylinkingrelationship

Identifiers

PMID37289180
PMCPMC10592534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.