Trial reportAnatolian journal of cardiology2023
Individualized Blind Techniques for Puncture of Intrathoracic and Extrathoracic Subclavian Vein: Three Simple Experience Tips.
Trial report in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough several procedures of subclavian venipuncture have been reported, no standard method has been established yet. The purpose of this study was to investigate some more accurate and improved blind puncture tips.
methodsA prospective study was conducted on patients who underwent cardiac radio-frequency ablation with the blind technique of subclavian venipuncture from August 2018 to June 2022. All patients were randomly assigned to an intrathoracic approach group or extrathoracic approach group. Each group of patients followed their own specific puncture scheme and tips.
resultsAbout 371 punctures were included. Blind subclavian venipunctures were performed with 98.9% technical success and without complications in all patients. The over-all success rate with an intrathoracic and extrathoracic approach was equivalent (96.7% vs. 98.3%, P =.23). The intrathoracic group showed a higher first-pass success compared with the extrathoracic group (91.9% vs. 80.2%, P = 0.003, respectively).
conclusionWe localized the landmark/reference and skin puncture site of an intrathoracic and extrathoracic subclavian venipuncture individually and quantitatively. These experiences make blind techniques more accurate and faster.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.