ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2023
Computational fluid dynamics-based virtual angiograms for the detection of flow stagnation in intracranial aneurysms.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Local pressure as a dominant hemodynamic driver of wall enhancement in anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a facet-level computational fluid dynamics and vessel wall imaging analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Modeling Perforator Occlusion After Flow Diversion.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Investigation of Contrast Retention in PCOM Aneurysms as a Possible Marker for Instability and Rupture.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this study was to test if CFD-based virtual angiograms could be used to automatically discriminate between intracranial aneurysms (IAs) with and without flow stagnation. Time density curves (TDC) were extracted from patient digital subtraction angiography (DSA) image sequences by computing the average gray level intensity inside the aneurysm region and used to define injection profiles for each subject. Subject-specific 3D models were reconstructed from 3D rotational angiography (3DRA) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed to simulate the blood flow inside IAs. Transport equations were solved numerically to simulate the dynamics of contrast injection into the parent arteries and IAs and then the contrast retention time (RET) was calculated. The importance of gravitational pooling of contrast agent within the aneurysm was evaluated by modeling contrast agent and blood as a mixture of two fluids with different densities and viscosities. Virtual angiograms can reproduce DSA sequences if the correct injection profile is used. RET can identify aneurysms with significant flow stagnation even when the injection profile is not known. Using a small sample of 14 IAs of which seven were previously classified as having flow stagnation, it was found that a threshold RET value of 0.46 s can successfully identify flow stagnation. CFD-based prediction of stagnation was in more than 90% agreement with independent visual DSA assessment of stagnation in a second sample of 34 IAs. While gravitational pooling prolonged contrast retention time it did not affect the predictive capabilities of RET. CFD-based virtual angiograms can detect flow stagnation in IAs and can be used to automatically identify aneurysms with flow stagnation even without including gravitational effects on contrast agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.