Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37288477›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023

Exploring the internal forward model: action-effect prediction and attention in sensorimotor processing.

Anthony W Harrison, Gethin Hughes, Gabriella Rudman, Bruce K Christensen, Thomas J Whitford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ERP correlates of agency processing in joint action.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anthony W HarrisonSchool of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Mathews Building, Library Walk, Kensington NSW 2052, Australia.
Gethin HughesDepartment of Psychology, University Of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, United Kingdom.
Gabriella RudmanSchool of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Mathews Building, Library Walk, Kensington NSW 2052, Australia.
Bruce K ChristensenResearch School of Psychology, Building 39, The Australian National University, Science Rd, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.
Thomas J WhitfordSchool of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Mathews Building, Library Walk, Kensington NSW 2052, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Action-effect predictions are believed to facilitate movement based on its association with sensory objectives and suppress the neurophysiological response to self- versus externally generated stimuli (i.e. sensory attenuation). However, research is needed to explore theorized differences in the use of action-effect prediction based on whether movement is uncued (i.e. volitional) or in response to external cues (i.e. stimulus-driven). While much of the sensory attenuation literature has examined effects involving the auditory N1, evidence is also conflicted regarding this component's sensitivity to action-effect prediction. In this study (n = 64), we explored the influence of action-effect contingency on event-related potentials associated with visually cued and uncued movement, as well as resultant stimuli. Our findings replicate recent evidence demonstrating reduced N1 amplitude for tones produced by stimulus-driven movement. Despite influencing motor preparation, action-effect contingency was not found to affect N1 amplitudes. Instead, we explore electrophysiological markers suggesting that attentional mechanisms may suppress the neurophysiological response to sound produced by stimulus-driven movement. Our findings demonstrate lateralized parieto-occipital activity that coincides with the auditory N1, corresponds to a reduction in its amplitude, and is topographically consistent with documented effects of attentional suppression. These results provide new insights into sensorimotor coordination and potential mechanisms underlying sensory attenuation.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionElectroencephalographyAcoustic StimulationAttentionEvoked PotentialsEvoked Potentials, AuditorySoundAction-effect contingencyevent-related potentialmotor preparationsensory attenuationvolition

Identifiers

PMID37288477
PMCPMC10350834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.