Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37288471›Full record

ReviewCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2023

Overview of glottic laryngeal cancer treatment recommendation changes in the NCCN guidelines from 2011 to 2022.

Lady Paola Aristizabal Arboleda, Aline Borburema Neves, Hugo Fontan Kohler, José Guilherme Vartanian, Letícia Miliano Candelária, Matheus Ferraz Borges, Gisele Aparecida Fernandes, Genival Barbosa de Carvalho, Luiz Paulo Kowalski, Paul Brennan and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Diagnostic value of MRI for posttreatment surveillance of early-stage (I-II) glottic larynx cancer.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lady Paola Aristizabal ArboledaGraduate Program, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Aline Borburema NevesGraduate Program, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hugo Fontan KohlerHead and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology Department, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
José Guilherme VartanianHead and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology Department, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1995-6742
Letícia Miliano CandeláriaGroup of Epidemiology and Statistics on Cancer, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Matheus Ferraz BorgesGroup of Epidemiology and Statistics on Cancer, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Gisele Aparecida FernandesGroup of Epidemiology and Statistics on Cancer, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Genival Barbosa de CarvalhoHead and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology Department, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Paulo KowalskiHead and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology Department, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0481-156X
Paul BrennanInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Genomic Epidemiology Branch, Lyon, France.
Alan Roger Santos-SilvaOral Diagnosis Department, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Maria Paula CuradoGroup of Epidemiology and Statistics on Cancer, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8172-2483

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment of glottic cancer remains challenging, especially with regard to morbidity reduction and larynx preservation rates. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has published guidelines to aid decision-making about this treatment according to the tumor site, clinical stage, and patient medical status.

aimThe present review was conducted to identify changes in the NCCN guidelines for glottic cancer treatment made between 2011 and 2022 and to describe the published evidence concerning glottic cancer treatment and oncological outcomes in the same time period. METHODS AND

resultsClinical practice guidelines for head and neck cancer published from 2011 up to 2022 were obtained from the NCCN website (www.NCCN.org). Data on glottic cancer treatment recommendations were extracted, and descriptive analysis was performed. In addition, a review of literature registered in the PubMed database was performed to obtain data on glottic cancer management protocols and treatment outcomes from randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published from 2011 to 2022. In total, 24 NCCN guidelines and updates and 68 relevant studies included in the PubMed database were identified. The main guideline changes made pertained to surgical and systemic therapies, the consideration of adverse features, and new options for the treatment of metastatic disease at initial presentation. Early-stage glottic cancer received the most research attention, with transoral endoscopic laser surgery and radiotherapy assessed and compared as the main treatment modalities. Reported associations between treatment types and survival rates for this stage of glottic cancer appear to be similar, but functional outcomes can be highly compromised.

conclusionNCCN panel members provide updated recommendations based on currently accepted treatment approaches for glottic cancer, constantly reviewing new surgical and non-surgical techniques. The guidelines support decision-making about glottic cancer treatment that should be individualized and prioritize patients' quality of life, functionality, and preferences.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsLaryngeal NeoplasmsLarynxTongue NeoplasmsGlottisHumansQuality of Lifeglottic cancerlaryngeal cancerNCCN guidelinesreviewtreatment

Identifiers

PMID37288471
PMCPMC10432469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.