Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37288452›Full record

ArticleGreen chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC2023

Microbial electrosynthesis with

Santiago T Boto, Bettina Bardl, Falk Harnisch, Miriam A Rosenbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Green chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Opinion on Biofilms as Production Systems.Microbial biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. HBiotechnology and bioengineering · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Advanced Electroanalysis for Electrosynthesis.ACS organic & inorganic Au · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. NonelectroactiveISME communications · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Santiago T BotoLeibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology - Hans Knöll Institute (Leibniz-HKI) Jena Germany miriam.rosenbaum@leibniz-hki.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7723-6260
Bettina BardlLeibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology - Hans Knöll Institute (Leibniz-HKI) Jena Germany miriam.rosenbaum@leibniz-hki.de.
Falk HarnischUFZ - Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research GmbH, Department of Environmental Microbiology Permoserstraße 15 04318 Leipzig Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0014-4640
Miriam A RosenbaumLeibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology - Hans Knöll Institute (Leibniz-HKI) Jena Germany miriam.rosenbaum@leibniz-hki.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4566-8624

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial electrosynthesis (MES) is a very promising technology addressing the challenge of carbon dioxide recycling into organic compounds, which might serve as building blocks for the (bio)chemical industry. However, poor process control and understanding of fundamental aspects such as the microbial extracellular electron transfer (EET) currently limit further developments. In the model acetogen

Identifiers

PMID37288452
PMCPMC10243432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.