ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2023
Translation and validation study of the Chinese version of the service user technology acceptability questionnaire.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Telemedicine Service Experience Questionnaire for Chinese Outpatients: Development and Validation Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Edmonton-33 scale in patients with head and neck cancer.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the translated Chinese version of the Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (C-SUTAQ). Methods: Patients with cancer ( Results: The critical ratio of each item of the C-SUTAQ ranged from 11.869 to 29.656; the correlation of each item and subscale ranged from 0.736 to 0.929. The Cronbach's α value for each subscale ranged from 0.659 to 0.941, and the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.859 to 0.966. The content validity index of the scale level and the item level content validity index of the instrument were both 1. Exploratory factor analysis indicated it was reasonable that the C-SUTAQ consists of six subscales after rotation. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good construct validity (χ Conclusions: The C-SUTAQ had good reliability and validity and may be useful to assess Chinese patients' acceptability of telecare. However, the small sample size limited generalization and there is a need to expand the sample to include persons with other diseases. Further studies are required using the translated questionnaire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.