Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37288331›Full record

ArticleStructural heart : the journal of the Heart Team2022

Description, Feasibility, and Histological Assessment of the Vsling, a Novel Transcatheter Ventricular Repair Device.

Gregg W Stone, Horst Sievert, Renu Virmani, Lea Waisman Shaler, Boaz Manash, David Neustadter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gregg W StoneThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Horst SievertCardioVascular Center Frankfurt CVC, Frankfurt, Germany.
Renu VirmaniCVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Lea Waisman ShalerCardiac Success Ltd, Yokneam, Israel.
Boaz ManashCardiac Success Ltd, Yokneam, Israel.
David NeustadterCardiac Success Ltd, Yokneam, Israel.
Cardiovascular Center Frankfurt · DECardiovascular Institute of the South · USCVPath Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reshaping the dilated left ventricle using a surgically implanted papillary muscle sling has been shown to provide long-term improvement in cardiac function compared to annuloplasty alone in patients with systolic heart failure. A papillary muscle sling which can be implanted via a transcatheter approach has the potential to make this treatment more widely available to patients. Methods: The Vsling transcatheter papillary muscle sling device was evaluated in a chronic animal model (sacrificed at 30 and 90 days), in a simulator, and in a human cadaver. Results: The Vsling device was successfully implanted in 10 pigs, 6 simulator procedures, and 1 human cadaver. Procedure complexity and device usability were rated as reasonable or better by 6 interventional cardiologists. Gross and histological analysis in chronic pigs through 90 days demonstrated near-complete endothelial coverage with mild inflammation and small hematoma formation but without adverse tissue reactions, thrombi, or embolization. Conclusions: Preliminary feasibility and safety of the Vsling implant and implantation procedure have been demonstrated. Human trials are planned to begin in the summer of 2022.

Indexed as

Heart failurePapillary muscle repositioningPapillary muscle slingTranscatheterVentricular reshaping

Identifiers

PMID37288331
PMCPMC10242562
OpenAlexW4289333665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.