Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37288176›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

The Slipper Fracture: Revisited.

Carolina Alvarez, Joshua Chen, Nick I Pilla, William Hennrikus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carolina AlvarezOrthopaedics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Joshua ChenOrthopaedics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Nick I PillaOrthopaedics, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.
William HennrikusOrthopaedics, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives The term "slipper fracture" is used to describe a fracture of the radius at the junction of the metaphysis and diaphysis. This fracture has an "evil" reputation because it often angulates in the cast. Historically, there have been differing opinions on the optimal way to cast slipper fractures either with a long arm cast in pronation or a long arm cast in supination to prevent angulation. The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes of "slipper fractures" treated with casting. Methods Sixteen slipper fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Electronic medical records (EMRs) and radiographs were analyzed to gather data on body weight, cast type, cast position, cast index, loss of reduction, cast wedging, repeat reduction, surgery, and amount of remodeling. Results The average age of the patients was eight years old. The average body weight was 30.4 kg. Initial casting included 14 long arm casts in neutral, one short arm cast, and one sugar tong splint. The average cast index was 0.87. Only one cast had a cast index of less than 0.8. This fracture was treated with a long arm cast and did not displace. Of the fractures, 94% lost reduction in the cast and angulated an average of 26 degrees. Two cases were treated with a cast wedge; 13 were observed. Remodeling occurred at an average rate of 2.7 degrees/month. The average remodeling measured at the last follow-up was 15 degrees. Conclusion Slipper fractures are difficult to treat due to the angulation of the fracture in the cast. The current study indicates that a long arm cast, appropriate cast index, and cast position are key to preventing the loss of reduction or angulation of a slipper fracture.

Indexed as

angulationfracturemetaphysisradiusslipper

Identifiers

PMID37288176
PMCPMC10241990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.