Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37288164›Full record

ArticlePlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)2023

Spatially explicit ecological modeling improves empirical characterization of plant pathogen dispersal.

Petteri Karisto, Frédéric Suffert, Alexey Mikaberidze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Petteri KaristoPlant Pathology Group, Institute of Integrative Biology ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4807-0190
Frédéric SuffertUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, UMR BIOGER 78850 Thiverval-Grignon France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6969-3878
Alexey MikaberidzePlant Pathology Group, Institute of Integrative Biology ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2278-2288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dispersal is a key ecological process, but it remains difficult to measure. By recording numbers of dispersed individuals at different distances from the source, one acquires a dispersal gradient. Dispersal gradients contain information on dispersal, but they are influenced by the spatial extent of the source. How can we separate the two contributions to extract knowledge about dispersal? One could use a small, point-like source for which a dispersal gradient represents a dispersal kernel, which quantifies the probability of an individual dispersal event from a source to a destination. However, the validity of this approximation cannot be established before conducting measurements. This represents a key challenge hindering progress in characterization of dispersal. To overcome it, we formulated a theory that incorporates the spatial extent of sources to estimate dispersal kernels from dispersal gradients. Using this theory, we re-analyzed published dispersal gradients for three major plant pathogens. We demonstrated that the three pathogens disperse over substantially shorter distances compared to conventional estimates. This method will allow the researchers to re-analyze a vast number of existing dispersal gradients to improve our knowledge about dispersal. The improved knowledge has potential to advance our understanding of species' range expansions and shifts, and inform management of weeds and diseases in crops.

Indexed as

dispersal ecologydispersal gradientdispersal kerneldispersal theoryexperimental designmathematical modeling

Identifiers

PMID37288164
PMCPMC10243544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.