ArticleResuscitation plus2023
Perceived threats and challenges experienced by first responders during their mission for an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Defining the terminology of first responders alerted for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by medical dispatch centres: An international consensus study on nomenclature.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Logistic and cognitive-emotional barriers experienced by first responders when alarmed to get dispatched to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest events: a region-wide survey.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Article
- The Effects of Serious Games on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training and Education: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.JMIR serious games · 2024Review
- Out of sight - Out of mind? The need for a professional and standardized peri-mission first responder support model.Resuscitation plus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: No study has systematically captured the perceived threat, discomfort or issues experienced by First Responders (FRs). We aimed to report the FRs' experience during a mission for an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in a ten-year span. Methods: We collected all the 40-items questionnaires filled out by the FRs dispatched in Ticino Region (Switzerland) from 01/10/2010 to 31/12/2020. We compared results between FRs alerted by SMS or APP and between professional and citizen FRs. Results: 3391 FRs filled the questionnaire. The OHCA information was considered complete more frequently by FRs alerted by APP (85.6% vs 76.8%, p < 0.001), but a challenge in reaching the location was more frequent (15.5% vs 11.4%, p < 0.001), mainly due to wrong GPS coordinate. The FRs initiated/participated in resuscitation in 64.6% and used an AED in 31.9% of OHCAs, without issue in 97.9%. FRs reported a very high-level of satisfaction (97%) in EMS collaboration, but one-third didn't have the possibility to debrief. Citizen FRs used AED more frequently than professional FRs (34.6% vs 30.7%, p < 0.01), but experienced more often difficulties in performing CPR (2.6% vs 1.2%, p = 0.02) and wore more in need to debrief (19.7% vs 13%, p < 0.01). Conclusions: We provide a unique picture from the FRs' point of view during a real-life OHCA reporting high-level of satisfaction, great motivation but also the need of systematic debrief. We identified areas of improvements including geolocation accuracy, further training on AED use and support program dedicated to citizen FRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.