ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2023
Machine Learning Spectroscopy Using a 2-Stage, Generalized Constituent Contribution Protocol.
Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced Prediction of Absorption and Emission Wavelengths of Organic Compounds through Hybrid Graph Neural Network Architectures.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Group Contribution Method Supervised Neural Network for Precise Design of Organic Nonlinear Optical Materials.Precision chemistry · 2024Article
- A Universal Framework for General Prediction of Physicochemical Properties: The Natural Growth Model.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A corrected group contribution (CGC)-molecule contribution (MC)-Bayesian neural network (BNN) protocol for accurate prediction of absorption spectra is presented. Upon combination of BNN with CGC methods, the full absorption spectra of various molecules are afforded accurately and efficiently-by using only a small dataset for training. Here, with a small training sample (<100), accurate prediction of maximum wavelength for single molecules is afforded with the first stage of the protocol; by contrast, previously reported machine learning (ML) methods require >1,000 samples to ensure the accuracy of prediction. Furthermore, with <500 samples, the mean square error in the prediction of full ultraviolet spectra reaches <2%; for comparison, ML models with molecular SMILES for training require a much larger dataset (>2,000) to achieve comparable accuracy. Moreover, by employing an MC method designed specifically for CGC that properly interprets the mixing rule, the spectra of mixtures are obtained with high accuracy. The logical origins of the good performance of the protocol are discussed in detail. Considering that such a constituent contribution protocol combines chemical principles and data-driven tools, most likely, it will be proven efficient to solve molecular-property-relevant problems in wider fields.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.