Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37287777›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Handwriting processes when spelling morphologically complex words in children with and without Developmental Language Disorder.

Sarah Critten, Vincent Connelly, Julie E Dockrell, Ian R Mundy, Lynsey O'Rourke, Laura Callaghan, Kirsty Walter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah CrittenSchool of Education, Childhood, Youth and Sport, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
Vincent ConnellyDepartment of Psychology, Health and Professional Development, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Julie E DockrellInstitute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ian R MundySchool of Social Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Lynsey O'RourkeDepartment of Psychology, Health and Professional Development, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Laura CallaghanWarwickshire Local Authority, Warwick, United Kingdom.
Kirsty WalterDepartment of Psychology, Health and Professional Development, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Oxford Brookes University · GBBirmingham City University · GBLocal Government Association · GBThe Open University · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Representations activated during handwriting production code information on morphological structure and reflect decomposition of the root and suffix. Children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) have significant difficulties in spelling morphologically complex words, but previous research has not sought evidence for a morphological decomposition effect via an examination of handwriting processes in this population. Method: Thirty-three children aged 9-10 years with DLD, 33 children matched for chronological age (CA), and 33 younger children aged 7-8 years matched for oral language ability (LA) completed a dictated spelling task (21 words; 12 with inflectional suffixes, nine with derivational suffixes). The task was completed on paper with an inking pen linked to a graphics tablet running the handwriting software Eye and Pen. Pause analyses and letter duration analyses were conducted. Results: The three groups showed similar handwriting processes, evidencing a morphological decomposition effect in a natural writing task. Pause durations observed at the root/suffix boundary were significantly longer than those occurring in the root. Letter durations were also significantly longer for the letter immediately prior to the boundary compared to the letter after it. Nevertheless, despite being commensurate to their LA matches for mean pause durations and letter durations, children with DLD were significantly poorer at spelling derivational morphemes. Handwriting processes did significantly predict spelling accuracy but to a much lesser extent compared to reading ability. Discussion: It is suggested that derivational spelling difficulties in DLD may derive more from problems with underspecified orthographic representations as opposed to handwriting processing differences.

Indexed as

childrenDevelopmental Language Disorderhand-writingmorphological decomposition effectmorphological spellingreading

Identifiers

PMID37287777
PMCPMC10243193
OpenAlexW4378085442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.