Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37287757›Full record

ArticleBiophysics reports2021

Advancing biological super-resolution microscopy through deep learning: a brief review.

Tianjie Yang, Yaoru Luo, Wei Ji, Ge Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysics reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tianjie YangInstitute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Yaoru LuoLaboratory of Computational Biology and Machine Intelligence, School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Wei JiInstitute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Ge YangLaboratory of Computational Biology and Machine Intelligence, School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological super-resolution microscopy is a new generation of imaging techniques that overcome the ~200 nm diffraction limit of conventional light microscopy in spatial resolution. By providing novel spatial or spatiotemporal information on biological processes at nanometer resolution with molecular specificity, it plays an increasingly important role in biomedical sciences. However, its technical constraints also require trade-offs to balance its spatial resolution, temporal resolution, and light exposure of samples. Recently, deep learning has achieved breakthrough performance in many image processing and computer vision tasks. It has also shown great promise in pushing the performance envelope of biological super-resolution microscopy. In this brief review, we survey recent advances in using deep learning to enhance the performance of biological super-resolution microscopy, focusing primarily on computational reconstruction of super-resolution images. Related key technical challenges are discussed. Despite the challenges, deep learning is expected to play an important role in the development of biological super-resolution microscopy. We conclude with an outlook into the future of this new research area.

Indexed as

Deep learningFluorescence microscopyImage reconstructionImage super-resolutionSuper-resolution microscopy

Identifiers

PMID37287757
PMCPMC10233474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.