Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37287737›Full record

ArticlePostepy psychiatrii neurologii2023

Consistency of the results of neurophysiological examinations with clinical diagnosis formed by the referring physician in ambulatory medical care.

Jan P Bembenek, Anna Sobańska, Tomasz Litwin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy psychiatrii neurologii, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Diagnosis: A Narrative Review of Complementary Roles of Neuromuscular Ultrasound and Electrodiagnostic Studies.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan P BembenekDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9424-1873
Anna SobańskaDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-913X
Tomasz LitwinDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2670-9651
Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Access to electroneurographic/electromyographic (ENG/EMG) examinations and the number of patients referred for electrodiagnostic (EDX) examination are increasing. We aimed to determine the accuracy of the initial clinical diagnosis made by outpatient medical care physicians who referred patients to the EMG laboratory. Methods: We analyzed referrals and EDX results of all patients who visited EMG laboratory of the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in Warsaw in 2021. Examinations were performed in accordance with the standards and norms adopted in our laboratory by EMG-certified neurologists, regarding the initial diagnosis stated by referring physicians. Results: A total of 454 EDX results from 412 patients were analyzed. Most of patients (54.6%) were referred with diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), followed by single nerves damage (18.7%), polyneuropathy (18.1%), tetany (7.0%), myasthenia gravis (1.3%) or myopathy (0.2%). The result of the ENG/EMG examination was: diagnosis confirmation (61.9%), a new clinically significant diagnosis or additional asymptomatic nerve damage (32.4%), and normal examination result (25.1%) of patients. Electrophysiological examination most often confirmed the referral diagnosis in patients with suspected CTS (75.4%), followed by single nerves damage (51.8%), polyneuropathy (48.8%), tetany (31.3%) and the least for myasthenia gravis and myopathy (0%). Conclusions: Our study showed frequent inconsistency of the EDX results with the clinical diagnosis formed by the referring physician. A high percentage of normal test results was noted. Initial diagnosis and the scope of EDX examination should be determined by detailed interview and physical examination.

Indexed as

consistency of resultselectrodiagnostic testsEMGreferrals

Identifiers

PMID37287737
PMCPMC10243291
OpenAlexW4376853178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.