Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37287694›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Significance of molecular diagnostics for therapeutic decision-making in recurrent glioma.

Jens Blobner, Laura Dengler, Sven Blobner, Constantin Eberle, Jonathan Weller, Nico Teske, Philipp Karschnia, Katharina Rühlmann, Kathrin Heinrich, Frank Ziemann and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jens BlobnerDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Laura DenglerDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Sven BlobnerMedical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelburg, Germany.
Constantin EberleDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Jonathan WellerDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Nico TeskeDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Philipp KarschniaDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1254-5310
Katharina RühlmannComprehensive Cancer Center München (CCC München), LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Kathrin HeinrichDepartment of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology Division and Cellular Immunotherapy Program, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Frank ZiemannDepartment of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology Division and Cellular Immunotherapy Program, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Philipp A GreifDepartment of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology Division and Cellular Immunotherapy Program, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Irmela JeremiasGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany.
Rachel WuerstleinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Korbinian HasselmannGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany.
Mario DorostkarGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany.
Patrick N HarterGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany.
Stefanie QuachDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Veit StoeckleinDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6206-0621
Nathalie L AlbertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Maximilian NiyaziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Joerg-Christian TonnDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Niklas ThonDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Benedikt Christoph WestphalenGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany.
Louisa von BaumgartenDepartment of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center · DELMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Targeted therapies have substantially improved survival in cancer patients with malignancies outside the brain. Whether in-depth analysis for molecular alterations may also offer therapeutic avenues in primary brain tumors remains unclear. We herein present our institutional experience for glioma patients discussed in our interdisciplinary Methods: We retrospectively searched the database of the MTB for all recurrent glioma patients after previous therapy. Recommendations were based on next-generation sequencing results of individual patient's tumor tissue. Clinical and molecular information, previous therapy regimens, and outcome parameters were collected. Results: Overall, 73 consecutive recurrent glioma patients were identified. In the median, advanced molecular testing was initiated with the third tumor recurrence. The median turnaround time between initiation of molecular profiling and MTB case discussion was 48 ± 75 days (range: 32-536 days). Targetable mutations were found for 50 recurrent glioma patients (68.5%). IDH1 mutation (27/73; 37%), epidermal growth factor receptor amplification (19/73; 26%), and NF1 mutation (8/73; 11%) were the most detected alterations and a molecular-based treatment recommendation could be made for all of them. Therapeutic recommendations were implemented in 12 cases (24%) and one-third of these heavily pretreated patients experienced clinical benefit with at least disease stabilization. Conclusions: In-depth molecular analysis of tumor tissue may guide targeted therapy also in brain tumor patients and considerable antitumor effects might be observed in selected cases. However, future studies to corroborate our results are needed.

Indexed as

molecular-matched targeted therapymolecular tumor boardrecurrent glioma

Identifiers

PMID37287694
PMCPMC10243988
OpenAlexW4379769461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.