Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37287568›Full record

ArticleSoft computing2023

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Securing health care data through blockchain enabled collaborative machine learning.

C U Om Kumar, Sudhakaran Gajendran, V Balaji, A Nhaveen, S Sai Balakrishnan

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Soft computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Integrating blockchain technology with artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of tibial plateau fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C U Om KumarSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai Campus, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2866-0281
Sudhakaran GajendranSchool of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai Campus, Chennai, India.
V BalajiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, SRM Easwari Engineering College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India.
A NhaveenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, SRM Easwari Engineering College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India.
S Sai BalakrishnanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, SRM Easwari Engineering College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transferring of data in machine learning from one party to another party is one of the issues that has been in existence since the development of technology. Health care data collection using machine learning techniques can lead to privacy issues which cause disturbances among the parties and reduces the possibility to work with either of the parties. Since centralized way of information transfer between two parties can be limited and risky as they are connected using machine learning, this factor motivated us to use the decentralized way where there is no connection but model transfer between both parties will be in process through a federated way. The purpose of this research is to investigate a model transfer between a user and the client(s) in an organization using federated learning techniques and reward the client(s) for their efforts with tokens accordingly using blockchain technology. In this research, the user shares a model to organizations that are willing to volunteer their service to provide help to the user. The model is trained and transferred among the user and the clients in the organizations in a privacy preserving way. In this research, we found that the process of model transfer between user and the volunteered organizations works completely fine with the help of federated learning techniques and the client(s) is/are rewarded with tokens for their efforts. We used the COVID-19 dataset to test the federation process, which yielded individual results of 88% for contributor a, 85% for contributor b, and 74% for contributor c. When using the FedAvg algorithm, we were able to achieve a total accuracy of 82%.

Indexed as

AlexNetBlockchainCOVID-19CT scan imagesFederated learningInception (V3)VGG-16

Identifiers

PMID37287568
PMCPMC10204011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.