Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37287502›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023

Application of Monocyte-to-Albumin Ratio and Neutrophil Percentage-to-Hemoglobin Ratio on Distinguishing Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients from Healthy Subjects.

Si-Ting Zhao, Xin-Xin Chen, Xian-Miao Yang, Shan-Chuan He, Fen-Hong Qian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Si-Ting ZhaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, People's Republic of China.
Xin-Xin ChenDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, People's Republic of China.
Xian-Miao YangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, People's Republic of China.
Shan-Chuan HeDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, People's Republic of China.
Fen-Hong QianDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, People's Republic of China.
Jiangsu University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims at assessing the potential benefits of observation of monocyte-to-albumin ratio (MAR) and neutrophil percentage-to-hemoglobin ratio (NPHR) in the detection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: This study retrospectively involved 195 NSCLC patients and 204 healthy volunteers. The correlations between the clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC and the two ratios including MAR and NPHR were assessed. The diagnostic efficiency of NSCLC patients by MAR and NPHR, alone or in combination with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The risk factors for NSCLC were analyzed with binary logistic regression. Results: Compared to healthy controls, the levels of MAR and NPHR in NSCLC patients were elevated. MAR and NPHR were related to clinicopathologic characteristics and increased significantly along with the progression of NSCLC. The area under the curve (AUC) for 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of MAR and NPHR in the diagnosis of NSCLC was 0.812 (0.769-0.854) and 0.724 (0.675-0.774), respectively. The combination of MAR, NPHR, and CEA achieved the highest diagnostic utility compared to each individually or combined markers (AUC, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.824-0.896; sensitivity, 72.8%; specificity, 87.3%). Further analysis showed that MAR combined with NPHR presented the potential to detect early-stage (IA-IIB) NSCLC (AUC, 0.794; 95% CI, 0.743-0.845; sensitivity, 55.1%; specificity, 87.7%). The result indicated that MAR and NPHR might be risk factors for NSCLC. Conclusion: MAR and NPHR could be novel and effective auxiliary indexes in the detection of NSCLC, especially when combined with CEA.

Indexed as

diagnosismonocyte-to-albumin rationeutrophil percentage-to-hemoglobin rationon-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID37287502
PMCPMC10243360
OpenAlexW4379232839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.