Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37287471›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)

A call to address structural barriers to Hispanic/Latino representation in clinical trials on Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: A micro-meso-macro perspective.

María P Aranda, David X Marquez, Dolores Gallagher-Thompson, Adriana Pérez, Julio C Rojas, Carl V Hill, Yarissa Reyes, Peggye Dilworth-Anderson, Elena Portacolone

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

María P ArandaUniversity of Southern California Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Los Angeles California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5229-4993
David X MarquezDepartment of Kinesiology and Nutrition University of Illinois Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.
Dolores Gallagher-ThompsonDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA.
Adriana PérezLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Julio C RojasMemory and Aging Center UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences University of California San Francisco Memory and Aging Center San Francisco California USA.
Carl V HillChief of Diversity Equity and Inclusion Alzheimer's Association Chicago Illinois USA.
Yarissa ReyesDirector of Diversity Equity and Inclusion Alzheimer's Association Chicago Illinois USA.
Peggye Dilworth-AndersonHealth Policy and Management Gillings School of Global Public Health 1104 D McGavran Greenberg, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill North Carolina USA.
Elena PortacoloneInstitute for Health and Aging University of California San Francisco Philip Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies University of California San Francisco San Francisco California USA.

Funding

Training Core (I)U54AG063546 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Daniella Meeker · 2019 to 2026
$125.9M
USCADRC Diversity Supplement PachicanoP30AG066530 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HELENA Chang CHUI, ARTHUR W TOGA · 2020 to 2026
$27.8M
USC Resource Center for Minority Aging Research (US-RCMAR)P30AG043073 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI EMMA AGUILA, JENNIFER A AILSHIRE · 2012 to 2026
$10.1M
Leveraging the national infrastructure of trusted organizations to increase representation of Latinos in dementia researchR24AG071456 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HILL, CARL V, PEREZ, GLORIA ADRIANA · 2021 to 2023
$2.4M
Proteomics for fluid biomarker discovery in frontotemporal dementiaK23AG059888 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROJAS-MARTINEZ, JULIO CESAR · 2019 to 2023
$995k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG059888NIA NIH HHS P30 AG043073NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066530NIA NIH HHS R24 AG071456NIA NIH HHS U54 AG063546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This perspective paper addresses the US Hispanic/Latino (herein, Latino) experience with regards to a significant public health concern-the underrepresentation of Latino persons in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD) clinical trials. Latino individuals are at increased risk for AD/ADRD, experience higher disease burden, and low receipt of care and services. We present a novel theoretical framework-the Micro-Meso-Macro Framework for Diversifying AD/ADRD Trial Recruitment-which considers multi-level barriers and their impact on Latino trial recruitment. Methods: Based on a review of the peer-reviewed literature and our lived experience with the Latino community, we drew from our interdisciplinary expertise in health equity and disparities research, Latino studies, social work, nursing, political economy, medicine, public health, and clinical AD/ADRD trials. We discuss factors likely to impede or accelerate Latino representation, and end with a call for action and recommendations for a bold path forward. Results: In the 200+ clinical trials conducted with over 70,000 US Americans, Latino participants comprise a fraction of AD/ADRD trial samples. Efforts to recruit Latino participants typically address individual- and family-level factors (micro-level) such as language, cultural beliefs, knowledge of aging and memory loss, limited awareness of research, and logistical considerations. Scientific efforts to understand recruitment barriers largely remain at this level, resulting in diminished attention to upstream institutional- and policy-level barriers, where decisions around scientific policies and funding allocations are ultimately made. These structural barriers are comprised of inadequacies or misalignments in trial budgets, study protocols, workforce competencies, healthcare-related barriers, criteria for reviewing and approving clinical trial funding, criteria for disseminating findings, etiological focus and social determinants of health, among others. Conclusion: Future scientific work should apply and test the Micro-Meso-Macro Framework for Diversifying AD/ADRD Trial Recruitment to examine structural recruitment barriers for historically underrepresented groups in AD/ADRD research and care.

Indexed as

clinical trialsfunding and regulatory strategiesmicro‐meso‐macro frameworkrecruitmentunderrepresented groups

Identifiers

PMID37287471
PMCPMC10242183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.