Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37287106›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2023

An ERP measure of non-conscious memory reveals dissociable implicit processes in human recognition using an open-source automated analytic pipeline.

Richard J Addante, Javier Lopez-Calderon, Nathaniel Allen, Carter Luck, Alana Muller, Lindsey Sirianni, Cory S Inman, Daniel L Drane

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard J AddanteSchool of Psychology, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3957-0188
Javier Lopez-CalderonInstituto de Matemáticas, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-1881-4769
Nathaniel AllenSchool of Psychology, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida, USA.
Carter LuckDepartment of Computer Science, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Alana MullerDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0853-5371
Lindsey SirianniSchool of Health Sciences, University of California - San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5779-4639
Cory S InmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2928-6252
Daniel L DraneDepartments of Neurology and Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8747-672X
Florida Institute of Technology · USEmory University · USReed College · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Talca · CLUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

National Neuropsychological Network (NNN)R01MH118514 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DANIEL L DRANE, David W. Loring · 2019 to 2026
$9.4M
Dissecting the Cognitive Roles of Hippocampus, Other Temporal Lobe StructuresR01NS088748 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DRANE, DANIEL L · 2014 to 2024
$6.4M
Multimodal imaging of memory in epilepsy from whole brain networks to local neuronal responses: Implications for surgical decision-makingR01NS124585 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MCDONALD, CARRIE R · 2022 to 2025
$3.3M
Mechanisms of Amygdala-Mediated Memory Enhancement in HumansR01MH120194 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIE, JON TIMOTHY · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118514NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120194NINDS NIH HHS L30 NS112849NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088748NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS124585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-conscious processing of human memory has traditionally been difficult to objectively measure and thus understand. A prior study on a group of hippocampal amnesia (N = 3) patients and healthy controls (N = 6) used a novel procedure for capturing neural correlates of implicit memory using event-related potentials (ERPs): old and new items were equated for varying levels of memory awareness, with ERP differences observed from 400 to 800 ms in bilateral parietal regions that were hippocampal-dependent. The current investigation sought to address the limitations of that study by increasing the sample of healthy subjects (N = 54), applying new controls for construct validity, and developing an improved, open-source tool for automated analysis of the procedure used for equating levels of memory awareness. Results faithfully reproduced prior ERP findings of parietal effects that a series of systematic control analyses validated were not contributed to nor contaminated by explicit memory. Implicit memory effects extended from 600 to 1000 ms, localized to right parietal sites. These ERP effects were found to be behaviorally relevant and specific in predicting implicit memory response times, and were topographically dissociable from other traditional ERP measures of implicit memory (miss vs. correct rejections) that instead occurred in left parietal regions. Results suggest first that equating for reported awareness of memory strength is a valid, powerful new method for revealing neural correlates of non-conscious human memory, and second, behavioral correlations suggest that these implicit effects reflect a pure form of priming, whereas misses represent fluency leading to the subjective experience of familiarity.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyRecognition, PsychologyEvoked PotentialsHumansMemoryMental RecallReaction Timeanalysis/statistical methodsERPshippocampusimplicit memoryreproducibility

Identifiers

PMID37287106
PMCPMC10524783
OpenAlexW4379768311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.