Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37286990›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

The somatic care of patients with comorbid mental disorders: protocol of a mixed-methods study aiming to identify barriers to and enablers of utilization of somatic healthcare (SoKo).

Sophie E Groß, Isabell Schellartz, Jürgen Zielasek, Lara Schlomann, Inna Klee, Careen Ritschel, Sandra Engemann, Barbara Steffens, Michaela Jänner, Oliver Funken and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie E Groß *Rhineland State Council - Institute of Healthcare Research (LVR-IVF), Cologne, Germany. sophie.gross@lvr.de.
Isabell Schellartz *Rhineland State Council - Institute of Healthcare Research (LVR-IVF), Cologne, Germany.
Jürgen ZielasekRhineland State Council - Institute of Healthcare Research (LVR-IVF), Cologne, Germany.
Lara SchlomannRhineland State Council - Institute of Healthcare Research (LVR-IVF), Cologne, Germany.
Inna KleeRhineland State Council - Institute of Healthcare Research (LVR-IVF), Cologne, Germany.
Careen RitschelRhineland State Council - Institute of Healthcare Research (LVR-IVF), Cologne, Germany.
Sandra EngemannRhineland State Council - Institute of Healthcare Research (LVR-IVF), Cologne, Germany.
Barbara SteffensTechniker Krankenkasse North Rhine-Westphalia, German Statutory Health Insurance Company (TK-NRW), Hamburg, Germany.
Michaela JännerMedical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Oliver FunkenGeneral Practitioners Association North Rhine, North Rhine, Germany.
Georg JuckelLWL University Hospital, Bochum, Germany.
Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-MayfrankRhineland State Council - Institute of Healthcare Research (LVR-IVF), Cologne, Germany.
LVR-Klinik Köln · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEAssociation of German Engineers · DELWL-Universitätsklinikum Bochum · DETechniker Krankenkasse (Germany) · DE

Funding

The study is publicly funded by the German Innovation Committee (Innovationsausschuss) of the Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA) 01VSF19052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare for people with somatic and comorbid mental diseases can pose a challenge to the healthcare system. The aim of the SoKo study (the Somatic care of patients with mental Comorbidity) is to assess the current state of care and the facilitators and barriers of somatic care of people with somatic disorders and comorbidity of a mental disorder.

methodsThe study is conducted as a mixed-methods approach and will include (a) descriptive and inferential analysis of secondary claims data of persons insured by a German statutory health insurance company in North Rhine-Westphalia (Techniker Krankenkasse, TK-NRW), (b) qualitative individual interviews and group discussions, and (c) based on (a) and (b), quantitative surveys of both patients and physicians. We intend to analyse a sample of claims data of about 2.6 million persons insured by TK-NRW (group comparisons between TK-NRW insured persons with a diagnosis of a prevalent somatic disease [ICD-10-GM E01-E07, E11, E66, I10-I15, I20-I25, I60-I64] with and without comorbidity of a mental disorder [F00-F99]), in order to assess the uptake of somatic care by people with mental and somatic comorbidity. In addition, primary data from patients with the aforementioned somatic illnesses and a mental comorbidity as well as primary data from physicians (general practitioners and medical specialists) will be collected. The focus here will be on support factors and barriers in the somatic care of people with mental comorbidity. DISCUSSION: Up to now, there have been no published results of a systematic collection of both secondary and primary data on the utilisation of different care services of somatically ill patients with mental comorbidity for Germany. The present mixed-methods study aims to address this gap.

trial registrationThe trial is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register DRKS: DRKS00030513. The trial was registered on 3rd February 2023.

Indexed as

General PractitionersMental DisordersComorbidityDelivery of Health CareGermanyHumansResearch DesignClaims dataComorbidityGeneral practitionersHealthcareMental disordersMixed methodsPatientsPhysiciansSomatic diseaseSpecialists

Identifiers

PMID37286990
PMCPMC10247265
OpenAlexW4379744641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.