Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37286893›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2023

Advances in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Mårten C G Winge, Laura N Kellman, Konnie Guo, Jean Y Tang, Susan M Swetter, Sumaira Z Aasi, Kavita Y Sarin, Anne Lynn S Chang, Paul A Khavari

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
23.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The tumor microenvironment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in high-risk patient groups: A scoping review.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mårten C G WingeProgram in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Laura N KellmanProgram in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Konnie GuoProgram in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jean Y TangDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Susan M SwetterDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Sumaira Z AasiDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Kavita Y SarinDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Anne Lynn S ChangDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2869-2147
Paul A KhavariProgram in Epithelial Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. khavari@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0098-4989
Stanford University · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human malignancies arise predominantly in tissues of epithelial origin, where the stepwise transformation from healthy epithelium to premalignant dysplasia to invasive neoplasia involves sequential dysregulation of biological networks that govern essential functions of epithelial homeostasis. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a prototype epithelial malignancy, often with a high tumour mutational burden. A plethora of risk genes, dominated by UV-induced sun damage, drive disease progression in conjunction with stromal interactions and local immunomodulation, enabling continuous tumour growth. Recent studies have identified subpopulations of SCC cells that specifically interact with the tumour microenvironment. These advances, along with increased knowledge of the impact of germline genetics and somatic mutations on cSCC development, have led to a greater appreciation of the complexity of skin cancer pathogenesis and have enabled progress in neoadjuvant immunotherapy, which has improved pathological complete response rates. Although measures for the prevention and therapeutic management of cSCC are associated with clinical benefit, the prognosis remains poor for advanced disease. Elucidating how the genetic mechanisms that drive cSCC interact with the tumour microenvironment is a current focus in efforts to understand, prevent and treat cSCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellSkin NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionHumansPrognosisTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID37286893
OpenAlexW4379647130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.