Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37286809›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Recycling of both resin and fibre from wind turbine blade waste via small molecule-assisted dissolution.

Roksana Muzyka, Szymon Sobek, Anna Korytkowska-Wałach, Łukasz Drewniak, Marcin Sajdak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roksana MuzykaDepartment of Air Protection, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology in Gliwice, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland.
Szymon SobekDepartment of Heating, Ventilation, and Dust Removal Technology, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology in Gliwice, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland.
Anna Korytkowska-WałachDepartment of Organic, Bioorganic and Biotechnological Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Silesian University of Technology in Gliwice, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland.
Łukasz DrewniakDepartment of Optoelectronics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 2 Krzywoustego St., 44-100, Gliwice, Poland.
Marcin SajdakDepartment of Air Protection, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology in Gliwice, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland. Marcin.Sajdak@polsl.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wind energy has significant growth potential and applicability on a global scale, but approximately 2.4% of wind turbine blades must be decommissioned annually. The majority of blade components can be recycled; however, wind blades are rarely recycled. In the present study, an alternative method was presented involving a small molecule-assisted technique based on a dynamic reaction that dissolves waste composite materials containing ester groups to recycle end-of-life wind turbine blades. This effective process requires temperatures below 200 °C, and the major component, i.e., resin, can be easily dissolved. This method can be applied to recycle composite materials, such as wind turbine blades and carbon fibre composites comprising fibres and resins. Depending on the waste, up to 100% of the resin degradation yield can be achieved. The solution used for the recycling process may be reused multiple times and can be reused to obtain resin-based components and create a closed loop for this type of material.

Identifiers

PMID37286809
PMCPMC10247820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.