ArticleNeurosurgical review2023
Cerebrospinal fluid leakage prevention using the anterior transpetrosal approach with versus without postoperative spinal drainage: an institutional cohort study.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevention of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage in the Anterior Transpetrosal Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficacy of spinal drain (SD) placement for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage prevention after the anterior transpetrosal approach (ATPA) remains unclear. Thus, we aimed to assess whether postoperative SD placement improved postoperative CSF leakage after a skull base reconstruction procedure using a small abdominal fat and pericranial flap and clarify whether bed rest with postoperative SD placement increased the length of hospital stay. This retrospective cohort study included 48 patients who underwent primary surgery using ATPA between August 2011 and February 2022. All cases underwent SD placement preoperatively. First, we evaluated the necessity of SD placement for CSF leakage prevention by comparing the postoperative routine continuous SD placement period to a period in which the SD was removed immediately after surgery. Second, the effects of different SD placement durations were evaluated to understand the adverse effects of SD placement requiring bed rest. No patient with or without postoperative continuous SD placement developed CSF leakage. The median postoperative time to first ambulation was 3 days shorter (P < 0.05), and the length of hospital stay was 7 days shorter (P < 0.05) for patients who underwent SD removal immediately after surgery (2 and 12 days, respectively) than for those who underwent SD removal on postoperative day 1 (5 and 19 days, respectively). This skull base reconstruction technique was effective in preventing CSF leakage in patients undergoing ATPA, and postoperative SD placement was not necessary. Removing the SD immediately after surgery can lead to earlier postoperative ambulation and shorter hospital stay by reducing medical complications and improving functional capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.