ReviewHNO2023
[Data from the 2022 ASCO Annual Meeting on surgical therapy].
Review in HNO, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Last year, studies on immuno-oncologic treatment approaches for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer were the main focus at the two major international cancer congresses of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). The success of these therapeutic strategies has led to many new studies, including their use in the neoadjuvant setting. This review article summarizes presented studies from ASCO 2022 in which surgical therapy is the focus of the study protocol and also includes study results on neoadjuvant treatment strategies. No surgical trials were presented at ESMO 2022. At ASCO 2022 as well as in previous years, it became increasingly clear that treatment de-escalation in the context of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma treatment involving surgical measures appears to be oncologically safe and functionally beneficial. In addition, a number of studies indicate that in the setting of neoadjuvant administration of immuno-oncologic agents, a proportion of patients have pathologic complete remission. In this fraction of patients, which is usually significantly smaller than 50%, survival data are better than in those who have already failed to respond to neoadjuvant therapy. Unfortunately, however, significant toxicities or tumor progression with the risk of inoperability were also seen under these current therapeutic regimens, leading to discontinuation of therapy in 5-20% of cases. It remains to be seen whether neoadjuvancy with immune checkpoint inhibitors can establish itself, in contrast to the failed attempts of the past with the use of cytostatics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37286710What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.