ArticleScientific reports2023
Combining machine learning with Cox models to identify predictors for incident post-menopausal breast cancer in the UK Biobank.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- WDCN: a comprehensive neural network based approach for estimating breast cancer risk.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Integrative cross-platform transcriptomic analysis coupled with machine learning identifies candidate biomarkers of abiotic stress resilience in Arabidopsis thaliana.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Liver cancer risk stratification using deep learning on nationwide longitudinal health screening data: a retrospective cohort study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Machine learning predicts diabetes risk in high-risk populations: analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Preoperative total cholesterol and axillary lymph node burden in breast cancer: an exploratory analysis with a preliminary nomogram.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Investigating long-term risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection from fluoroquinolones and the key contributing factors using machine learning methods.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The mediating roles of anthropo-metabolic biomarkers on the association between beverage consumption and breast cancer risk.Nutrition journal · 2025Article
- A generative model for evaluating missing data methods in large epidemiological cohorts.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Regression and machine learning approaches identify potential risk factors for glioblastoma multiforme.Brain communications · 2025Article
- LLpowershap: logistic loss-based automated Shapley values feature selection method.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparative impact of the affordable care act on breast cancer outcomes among women in two US states.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Breast Cancer Dataset, Classification and Detection Using Deep Learning.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Follicular Lymphoma-Grade 3: A Study Based on the SEER Database.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to identify potential novel predictors for breast cancer among post-menopausal women, with pre-specified interest in the role of polygenic risk scores (PRS) for risk prediction. We utilised an analysis pipeline where machine learning was used for feature selection, prior to risk prediction by classical statistical models. An "extreme gradient boosting" (XGBoost) machine with Shapley feature-importance measures were used for feature selection among [Formula: see text] 1.7 k features in 104,313 post-menopausal women from the UK Biobank. We constructed and compared the "augmented" Cox model (incorporating the two PRS, known and novel predictors) with a "baseline" Cox model (incorporating the two PRS and known predictors) for risk prediction. Both of the two PRS were significant in the augmented Cox model ([Formula: see text]). XGBoost identified 10 novel features, among which five showed significant associations with post-menopausal breast cancer: plasma urea (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, [Formula: see text]), plasma phosphate (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.88, [Formula: see text]), basal metabolic rate (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.11-1.24, [Formula: see text]), red blood cell count (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.08-1.35, [Formula: see text]), and creatinine in urine (HR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09, [Formula: see text]). Risk discrimination was maintained in the augmented Cox model, yielding C-index 0.673 vs 0.667 (baseline Cox model) with the training data and 0.665 vs 0.664 with the test data. We identified blood/urine biomarkers as potential novel predictors for post-menopausal breast cancer. Our findings provide new insights to breast cancer risk. Future research should validate novel predictors, investigate using multiple PRS and more precise anthropometry measures for better breast cancer risk prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.