ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2024
Development of a computed tomography calcium scoring technique for assessing calcinosis distribution, pattern and burden in dermatomyositis.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging features of juvenile dermatomyositis complicated by pyomyositis in a 12-year-old boy: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Imaging assessment of calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis: a narrative review.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Review
- Calcinosis in dermatomyositis.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo utilize whole-body CT imaging and calcium scoring techniques as tools for calcinosis assessment in a prospective cohort of patients with adult and juvenile dermatomyositis (DM and JDM, respectively).
methodsThirty-one patients (14 DM and 17 JDM) who fulfilled Bohan and Peter Classification criteria as probable or definite DM, the EULAR-ACR criteria for definite DM, and with calcinosis identified by physical examination or prior imaging studies were included. Non-contrast whole-body CT scans were obtained using low-dose radiation procedures. Scans were read qualitatively and quantitated. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of calcinosis detection of physician physical exam against CT. We quantified calcinosis burden using the Agatston scoring technique.
resultsWe identified five distinct calcinosis patterns: Clustered, Disjoint, Interfascial, Confluent and Fluid-filled. Novel locations of calcinosis were observed, including the cardiac tissue, pelvic and shoulder bursa, and the spermatic cord. Quantitative measures using Agatston scoring for calcinosis were used in regional distributions across the body. Physician physical exams had a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 90% compared with CT detection. A higher calcium score correlated with higher Physician Global Damage, Calcinosis Severity scores, and disease duration.
conclusionWhole-body CT scans and the Agatston scoring metric define distinct calcinosis patterns and provide novel insights relating to calcinosis in DM and JDM patients. Physicians' physical examinations underrepresented the presence of calcium. Calcium scoring of CT scans correlated with clinical measures, which suggests that this method may be used to assess calcinosis and follow its progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.