Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37286349›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Neural Evidence for Boundary Updating as the Source of the Repulsive Bias in Classification.

Heeseung Lee, Hyang-Jung Lee, Kyoung Whan Choe, Sang-Hun Lee

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heeseung LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Hyang-Jung LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Kyoung Whan ChoeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Hun LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea visionsl@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binary classification, an act of sorting items into two classes by setting a boundary, is biased by recent history. One common form of such bias is repulsive bias, a tendency to sort an item into the class opposite to its preceding items. Sensory-adaptation and boundary-updating are considered as two contending sources of the repulsive bias, yet no neural support has been provided for either source. Here, we explored human brains of both men and women, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), to find such support by relating the brain signals of sensory-adaptation and boundary-updating to human classification behavior. We found that the stimulus-encoding signal in the early visual cortex adapted to previous stimuli, yet its adaptation-related changes were dissociated from current choices. Contrastingly, the boundary-representing signals in the inferior-parietal and superior-temporal cortices shifted to previous stimuli and covaried with current choices. Our exploration points to boundary-updating, rather than sensory-adaptation, as the origin of the repulsive bias in binary classification.

Indexed as

BrainDecision MakingAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleTemporal LobeVisual PerceptionBayesian inferencehistory effectperceptual decisionrepulsive biassensory adaptation

Identifiers

PMID37286349
PMCPMC10286949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.