Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37286319›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

'connEcted caesarean section': creating a virtual link between MOthers and their infanTs to ImprOve maternal childbirth experieNce - study protocol for a PILOT trial (e-motion-pilot).

Fiona Corbaz, Emilie Boussac, Karine Lepigeon, Diana Gomes Dias, Sandra Marcadent, David Desseauve, Antje Horsch

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05319665 ("connEcted Caesarean Section"), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05319665 nacompletednot on this map

"connEcted Caesarean Section": Creating a Virtual Link Between MOthers and Their infanTs to ImprOve Maternal Childbirth experieNce: a PILOT Trial (E-motion-pilot)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire VaudoisRan2022 to 2022Enrolled71ConditionsPost Traumatic Stress Disorder, Childbirth ExperienceArmsHead-mounted display
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fiona CorbazWoman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland fiona.corbaz@chuv.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-6778-3527
Emilie BoussacAnesthesiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Karine LepigeonWoman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Diana Gomes DiasWoman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sandra MarcadentSignal Processing Laboratory 5, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6470-3974
David Desseauve *Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1308-7750
Antje Horsch *Woman-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9950-9661
University of Lausanne · CHÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne-third of mothers rate their childbirth as traumatic. The prevalence of childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder (CB-PTSD) is 4.7%. Skin-to-skin contact is a protective factor against CB-PTSD. However, during a caesarean section (CS), skin-to-skin contact is not always feasible and mothers and infants are often separated. In those cases, there is no validated and available solution to substitute this unique protective factor. Based on the results of studies using virtual reality and head-mounted displays (HMDs) and studies on childbirth experience, we hypothesise that enabling the mother to have a visual and auditory contact with her baby could improve her childbirth experience while she and her baby are separated. To facilitate this connection, we will use a two-dimensional 360° camera filming the baby linked securely to an HMD that the mother can wear during the end of the surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study protocol describes a monocentric open-label controlled pilot trial with minimal risk testing the effects of a visual and auditory contact via an HMD worn by the mother airing a live video of her newborn compared with treatment-as-usual in 70 women after CS. The first 35 consecutive participants will be the control group and will receive the standard care. The next 35 consecutive participants will have the intervention. The primary outcome will be differences in maternal childbirth experience (Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2) at 1-week postpartum between the intervention and control groups. Secondary outcomes will be CB-PTSD symptoms, birth satisfaction, mother-infant bonding, perceived pain and stress during childbirth, maternal anxiety and depression symptoms, anaesthesiological data and acceptability of the procedure. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Canton de Vaud (study number 2022-00215). Dissemination of results will occur via national and international conferences, peer-reviewed journals, public conferences and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05319665.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionMothersDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornParturitionPilot ProjectsPregnancyAdult psychiatryAnaesthesia in obstetricsMaternal medicineVirtual Reality

Identifiers

PMID37286319
PMCPMC10255091
OpenAlexW4379645211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.