Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37285361›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Using machine learning-based systems to help predict disengagement from the legal proceedings by women victims of intimate partner violence in Spain.

Elena Escobar-Linero, María García-Jiménez, María Eva Trigo-Sánchez, María Jesús Cala-Carrillo, José Luis Sevillano, Manuel Domínguez-Morales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elena Escobar-LineroArchitecture and Computer Technology department (ATC), Robotics and Technology of Computers Lab (RTC), E.T.S. Ingeniería Informática, Avda. Reina Mercedes s/n, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8789-6476
María García-JiménezDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Facultad de Psicología, C/Camilo José Cela s/n, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
María Eva Trigo-SánchezDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Facultad de Psicología, C/Camilo José Cela s/n, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
María Jesús Cala-CarrilloDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Facultad de Psicología, C/Camilo José Cela s/n, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
José Luis SevillanoArchitecture and Computer Technology department (ATC), Robotics and Technology of Computers Lab (RTC), E.T.S. Ingeniería Informática, Avda. Reina Mercedes s/n, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1392-1832
Manuel Domínguez-MoralesArchitecture and Computer Technology department (ATC), Robotics and Technology of Computers Lab (RTC), E.T.S. Ingeniería Informática, Avda. Reina Mercedes s/n, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5669-9111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intimate partner violence against women (IPVW) is a pressing social issue which poses a challenge in terms of prevention, legal action, and reporting the abuse once it has occurred. However, a significant number of female victims who file a complaint against their abuser and initiate legal proceedings, subsequently, withdraw charges for different reasons. Research in this field has been focusing on identifying the factors underlying women victims' decision to disengage from the legal process to enable intervention before this occurs. Previous studies have applied statistical models to use input variables and make a prediction of withdrawal. However, none have used machine learning models to predict disengagement from legal proceedings in IPVW cases. This could represent a more accurate way of detecting these events. This study applied machine learning (ML) techniques to predict the decision of IPVW victims to withdraw from prosecution. Three different ML algorithms were optimized and tested with the original dataset to assess the performance of ML models against non-linear input data. Once the best models had been obtained, explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) techniques were applied to search for the most informative input features and reduce the original dataset to the most important variables. Finally, these results were compared to those obtained in the previous work that used statistical techniques, and the set of most informative parameters was combined with the variables of the previous study, showing that ML-based models had a better predictive accuracy in all cases and that by adding one new variable to the previous work's predictive model, the accuracy to detect withdrawal improved by 7.5%.

Indexed as

Crime VictimsIntimate Partner ViolenceArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansMachine LearningSpain

Identifiers

PMID37285361
PMCPMC10246857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.