ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
The NanoFlow Repository.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- MIBlood-EV: Minimal information to enhance the quality and reproducibility of blood extracellular vesicle research.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2023Pooled it
- EV-Checklist: AI-Powered Rapid Documentation for Enhancing Transparency and Accessibility of Extracellular Vesicle Research Data.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026Article
- Evaluating the utility of a nanoscale flow cytometer for detection of surface proteins on HIV and extracellular vesicles.Virology journal · 2026Article
- Seminar: Extracellular Vesicles as Mediators of Environmental Stress in Human Disease.Environmental health perspectives · 2023Article
- Toward a human brain extracellular vesicle atlas: Characteristics of extracellular vesicles from different brain regions, including small RNA and protein profiles.Interdisciplinary medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationExtracellular particles (EPs) are the focus of a rapidly growing area of exploration due to the widespread interest in understanding their roles in health and disease. However, despite the general need for EP data sharing and established community standards for data reporting, no standard repository for EP flow cytometry data captures rigor and minimum reporting standards such as those defined by MIFlowCyt-EV (https://doi.org/10.1080/20013078.2020.1713526). We sought to address this unmet need by developing the NanoFlow Repository.
resultsWe have developed The NanoFlow Repository to provide the first implementation of the MIFlowCyt-EV framework. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The NanoFlow Repository is freely available and accessible online at https://genboree.org/nano-ui/. Public datasets can be explored and downloaded at https://genboree.org/nano-ui/ld/datasets. The NanoFlow Repository's backend is built using the Genboree software stack that powers the ClinGen Resource, specifically the Linked Data Hub (LDH), a REST API framework written in Node.js, developed initially to aggregate data within ClinGen (https://ldh.clinicalgenome.org/ldh/ui/about). NanoFlow's LDH (NanoAPI) is available at https://genboree.org/nano-api/srvc. NanoAPI is supported by a Node.js Genboree authentication and authorization service (GbAuth), a graph database called ArangoDB, and an Apache Pulsar message queue (NanoMQ) to manage data inflows into NanoAPI. The website for NanoFlow Repository is built with Vue.js and Node.js (NanoUI) and supports all major browsers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.