ArticleJAMA network open2023
Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Responses to Public Health Questions.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Large Language Models for Chatbot Health Advice Studies: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of large language model responses to patient questions on oral anticoagulant therapy: a comparative expert assessment.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Usability and Technology Acceptance of a Wearable Monitoring System Among Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Artificial intelligence chatbots in endodontic education-Concepts and potential applications.International endodontic journal · 2026Review
- Measuring eHealth Literacy in the European Economic Area, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- User Experience and Early Clinical Outcomes of a Mental Wellness Chatbot for Depression and Anxiety: Pilot Evaluation Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Assessing Generative AI Chatbots for Alcohol Misuse Support: A Longitudinal Simulation Study.NEJM AI · 2026Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in hepatology.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Alignment Between Large Language Models and Expert Clinicians in Suicide Risk Assessment.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Large language models as information providers for appropriate antimicrobial use: computational text analysis and expert-rated comparison of ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- ChatGPT-Based Chatbot for Help Quitting Smoking via Text Messaging: An Interventional Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Evaluation of artificial ıntelligence use in ankylosing spondylitis with ChatGPT-4: patient and physician perspectives.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of large language models performance in medical education using urinary system histology assessment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The role of large language models in self-care: a study and benchmark on medicines and supplement guidance accuracy.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Hey ChatGPT, Let's Talk About Sexual Consent.Journal of sex research · 2025Article
- A validity and reliability study of the artificial intelligence attitude scale (AIAS-4) and its relationship with social media addiction and eating behaviors in Turkish adults.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of ChatGPT as a Reliable Source of Medical Information on Prostate Cancer for Patients: Global Comparative Survey of Medical Oncologists and Urologists.Urology practice · 2025Article
- Era of Generalist Conversational Artificial Intelligence to Support Public Health Communications.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing Health Care: The Transformative Impact of Large Language Models in Medicine.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The Goldilocks Zone: Finding the right balance of user and institutional risk for suicide-related generative AI queries.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.