Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37285108›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2023

Why are phytoseiid predatory mites not effectively controlling Echinothrips americanus?

Dominiek Vangansbeke, Emilie Van Doren, Marcus V A Duarte, Juliette Pijnakker, Felix Wäckers, Patrick De Clercq

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dominiek VangansbekeBiobest N.V, Ilse Velden 18, Westerlo, B-2260, Belgium. dominiek.vangansbeke@biobestgroup.com.
Emilie Van DorenLaboratory of Agrozoology, Department of Plants and Crops, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, Ghent, B-9000, Belgium.
Marcus V A DuarteBiobest N.V, Ilse Velden 18, Westerlo, B-2260, Belgium.
Juliette PijnakkerBiobest N.V, Ilse Velden 18, Westerlo, B-2260, Belgium.
Felix WäckersBiobest N.V, Ilse Velden 18, Westerlo, B-2260, Belgium.
Patrick De ClercqLaboratory of Agrozoology, Department of Plants and Crops, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, Ghent, B-9000, Belgium.
Best Biotech · USGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The poinsettia thrips, Echinothrips americanus Morgan (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), is a key pest of various ornamental and vegetable greenhouse crops. As current biological control alternatives lack efficiency, applying chemicals remains the dominant control strategy, thereby heavily disturbing the biocontrol-based integrated management of other pests. For a range of other thrips pests, phytoseiid predatory mites have shown to be effective biocontrol agents, being able to overcome the thrips' physical and chemical defense armory. Here, we investigated potential underlying causes for the lack of phytoseiid efficacy in controlling E. americanus. First, we assessed the nutritional value of E. americanus for the predatory mite Amblydromalus limonicus (Garman and McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) when its physical or chemical defenses were eliminated by freezing the thrips. The phytoseiid could complete its immature development when frozen thrips instars were offered, but not when these were offered alive. Subsequently, we tested whether adult female A. limonicus had a higher predation rate on first instar E. americanus when they had been given experience with either live or frozen E. americanus during their immature development (i.e., conditioning). Conditioning significantly increased the predation capacity of the phytoseiid. Finally, we tested the control potential of conditioned A. limonicus versus naïve ones when exposed to E. americanus on sweet pepper plants. In contrast to the laboratory trials, at the plant level, conditioning did not yield better control. Possible factors explaining insufficient control of E. americanus by phytoseiids are discussed.

Indexed as

MitesThysanopteraAnimalsCrops, AgriculturalPest Control, BiologicalPredatory BehaviorConditioningDefensive behaviorEchinothripsPhytoseiidaePredation

Identifiers

PMID37285108
OpenAlexW4379600311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.