ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2023
Why are phytoseiid predatory mites not effectively controlling Echinothrips americanus?
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of natural enemies against the tobacco thrips Thrips parvispinus (Karny) in laboratory and greenhouse studies.Pest management science · 2026Article
- Residual effect of commonly used fungicides in strawberries on Amblyseius swirskii, Neoseiulus cucumeris, and Neoseiulus californicus (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae).Experimental & applied acarology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The poinsettia thrips, Echinothrips americanus Morgan (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), is a key pest of various ornamental and vegetable greenhouse crops. As current biological control alternatives lack efficiency, applying chemicals remains the dominant control strategy, thereby heavily disturbing the biocontrol-based integrated management of other pests. For a range of other thrips pests, phytoseiid predatory mites have shown to be effective biocontrol agents, being able to overcome the thrips' physical and chemical defense armory. Here, we investigated potential underlying causes for the lack of phytoseiid efficacy in controlling E. americanus. First, we assessed the nutritional value of E. americanus for the predatory mite Amblydromalus limonicus (Garman and McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) when its physical or chemical defenses were eliminated by freezing the thrips. The phytoseiid could complete its immature development when frozen thrips instars were offered, but not when these were offered alive. Subsequently, we tested whether adult female A. limonicus had a higher predation rate on first instar E. americanus when they had been given experience with either live or frozen E. americanus during their immature development (i.e., conditioning). Conditioning significantly increased the predation capacity of the phytoseiid. Finally, we tested the control potential of conditioned A. limonicus versus naïve ones when exposed to E. americanus on sweet pepper plants. In contrast to the laboratory trials, at the plant level, conditioning did not yield better control. Possible factors explaining insufficient control of E. americanus by phytoseiids are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.