Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023
The effect of complex decongestive physiotherapy applied with different compression pressures on skin and subcutaneous tissue thickness in individuals with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a double-blinded randomized comparison trial.
Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Complex Decongestive Physiotherapy Applied With Different Compression Pressures on Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Thickness in Individuals With Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema: a Double-blinded Randomized Comparison Trial
Investigation of the Effects of Complex Decongestive Physiotherapy on Sleep Quality and Quality of Life in Women With Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Wrapping up the evidence: bandaging in breast cancer-related lymphedema-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Pooled it
- Cell-Free Adipose Liquid Extract Combined with Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer for Treating Lymphedema: Implications for Human Therapy.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Article
- Elastic Compression Attenuates Inflammatory Response in a Model of Acute Subcutaneous Abdominal Inflammation.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Compression Therapy in Human Body Applications: A Systematic Review from Principles to Practice.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Lymphedema: current treatment strategies and future directions in tissue engineering.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Nursing-Led Strategies - A Narrative Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Personalizing Breast Cancer Surgery: Harnessing the Power of ROME (Radiological and Oncoplastic Multidisciplinary Evaluation).Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Predictors of the Efficacy of Lymphedema Decongestive Therapy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Fatigue and sleep quality improvement through complete decongestive therapy in postmastectomy lymphedema: An investigative analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of compression bandage applied with different pressures on the skin and subcutaneous thickness in individuals with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).
methods21 individuals with stage 2 unilateral BCRL participated in the study. Individuals were randomly allocated into two groups as low-pressure bandage (20-30 mmHg) (n: 11) and high-pressure bandage (45-55 mmHg) (n: 10). Skin and subcutaneous tissue thickness, extremity volume, sleep quality, treatment benefit, and comfort were evaluated by ultrasound from 6 reference points (as hand dorsum, wrist volar, forearm volar, arm volar, forearm dorsum, and arm dorsum), volumetric measurement, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Patient Benefit Index-Lymphedema, and visual analog scale, respectively. Complex decongestive physiotherapy was applied to both groups. Compression bandage was applied according to their group. Individuals were evaluated at the baseline, 1st session, 10th session, 20th session, and at 3-month follow-up.
resultsSkin thickness decreased significantly in the volar reference points of the extremity in the high-pressure bandage group (p = 0.004, p = 0.031, and p = 0.003). Subcutaneous tissue thickness significantly decreased at all reference points in the high-pressure bandage group (p < 0.05). In the low-pressure bandage group, skin thickness only decreased in the forearm dorsum and the arm dorsum (p = 0.002, p = 0.035) and subcutaneous tissue thickness changed for all points (p < 0.05) except for hand and arm dorsum (p = 0.064, p = 0.236). Edema decreased in a shorter time in the high-pressure bandage group (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in sleep quality, treatment benefit, and comfort for both groups (p = 0.316, p = 0.300, and p = 0.557, respectively).
conclusionHigh pressure was more effective in reducing subcutaneous tissue thickness in the dorsum of hand and arm. The usage of high-pressure can be recommended especially in cases which have edema in the dorsum of hand and arm which is difficult to resolve. Also, high-pressure bandage can provide faster edema resolution and can be used in rapid volume reduction as desired. Treatment outcomes may improve with high-pressure bandage without any impairment in comfort, sleep quality, and treatment benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE: NCT05660590, 12/26/2022 retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.